Skip to content

L4 Market Gateway: Hardware-Aware Resilience Implementation (v3.8.9)#296

Open
dcplatforms wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
l4-hardware-aware-resilience-1484179567536887359
Open

L4 Market Gateway: Hardware-Aware Resilience Implementation (v3.8.9)#296
dcplatforms wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
l4-hardware-aware-resilience-1484179567536887359

Conversation

@dcplatforms

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

I have implemented Hardware-Aware Resilience for the L4 Market Gateway (v3.8.9). This update introduces granular site-specific safety isolation and dynamic bidding penalties based on regional hardware health, ensuring the grid is protected from unreliable DERs while maintaining maximum market participation.

Key Accomplishments:

  • Site-Specific Isolation: L4 now proactively scans for site-level locks (l1:safety:lock:site:*) to prevent dispatch to compromised hardware.
  • Hardware Health Penalty: Implemented a dynamic penalty system (0.05 per alarm, capped at 0.30) using Decimal.js to reduce bid quantities in regions with high alarm density.
  • Proactive Alarm Tracking: The DER_ALARM_REPORTED Kafka consumer now increments regional alarm counters in Redis (l4:regional:alarms:<ISO>) with a 1-hour rolling window.
  • Audit Parity: Enhanced BiddingOptimizer to ensure that capacity and fidelity metadata are always recorded for L11 ML training, even when bidding is halted by safety locks.
  • Platform Sync: Upgraded L1 Physics Engine to v10.1.6 and synchronized all status documentation and master backlogs.

Verification:

  • All 31 tests in services/04-market-gateway passed, including a new targeted suite verify_l4_v3_8_9.test.js.
  • Resolved blocking ReferenceError and logic flaws identified during internal review to ensure site-specific locks do not cause global bidding halts.
  • Verified documentation integrity via node verify_integrity.js.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 1484179567536887359 started by @dcplatforms

L4 Health & Dependency Report:
The L4 Market Gateway is now synchronized with L1 v10.1.6 and L7 v5.13.0,
implementing site-specific safety isolation and dynamic hardware health penalties.

Key Changes:
- Implemented site-specific safety cache in localSafetyCache.site_safety.
- Integrated Hardware Health Penalty (0.05 per regional alarm, cap 0.30).
- Refactored DER_ALARM_REPORTED consumer to track regional alarm counts.
- Optimized audit trails to include regional_alarm_count and hardware_penalty.
- Synchronized L1 version to v10.1.6 for site-level lock parity.
- Updated PLATFORM_STATUS.md and MASTER_BACKLOG.md.

Engineering Execution:
- Expanded updateLocalSafetyCache poller with Redis SCAN for site locks.
- Hardened BiddingOptimizer.js to calculate capacity/fidelity before lock checks.
- Verified with 31 tests including new site-lock and penalty validation.

Co-authored-by: dcplatforms <10982057+dcplatforms@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant