Skip to content

L10 Token Engine v4.3.8: Hardware Health Penalty & AI Alignment#298

Open
dcplatforms wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
l10-v4-3-8-hardware-penalty-11731477701295753046
Open

L10 Token Engine v4.3.8: Hardware Health Penalty & AI Alignment#298
dcplatforms wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
l10-v4-3-8-hardware-penalty-11731477701295753046

Conversation

@dcplatforms

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This update advances the L10 Token Engine to v4.3.8, focusing on Hardware-Aware Resilience and Phase 6 AI alignment.

Key changes include:

  1. Hardware Health Penalty: Rewards are now dynamically reduced based on active regional hardware alarms found in Redis (l4:regional:alarms:<ISO>). This penalizes behavior that adds stress to unstable grid regions, aligning L10 with L4 Market Gateway v3.8.9.
  2. Telemetry Precision Hardening: Integrated the safeFloat utility across all reward logging to ensure physics_score and confidence_score are stored as deterministic 4-decimal strings, satisfying L11 ML Engine requirements for high-fidelity ground truth.
  3. Architectural Parity: Consolidated the extractSiteId function to maintain a single source of truth for site identification across the MiGrid stack.
  4. Documentation: Synchronized PLATFORM_STATUS.md and MASTER_BACKLOG.md and generated the WEEKLY_REPORT_JUNE_2026.md.

Verified with 30 passing unit tests in services/10-token-engine/.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 11731477701295753046 started by @dcplatforms

…v4.3.8

- Implement applyHardwarePenalty (-0.05 per alarm, cap 0.30) synchronized with L4.
- Enforce .toFixed(4) string formatting via safeFloat for L11 ML parity.
- Consolidate extractSiteId helper with robust null handling.
- Update platform status and master backlog for v4.3.8.
- Add hardware_penalty.test.js suite.

Co-authored-by: dcplatforms <10982057+dcplatforms@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant