Primary Type Syntax

[Bolpat]

In the grammar, I use ? to signify optional occurrence.

    FunctionLiteral:
-       function RefOrAutoRef? BasicTypeWithSuffixes? ParameterWithAttributes? FunctionLiteralBody
-       delegate RefOrAutoRef? BasicTypeWithSuffixes? ParameterWithMemberAttributes? FunctionLiteralBody
+       function LinkageAttribute? RefOrAutoRef? BasicTypeWithSuffixes? ParameterWithAttributes? FunctionLiteralBody
+       delegate LinkageAttribute? RefOrAutoRef? BasicTypeWithSuffixes? ParameterWithMemberAttributes? FunctionLiteralBody

    Type:
        TypeCtors? BasicType TypeSuffixes?
+       TypeCtors? ref TypeCtors? BasicType TypeSuffixes
+       TypeCtors? LinkageAttribute ref? TypeCtors? BasicType TypeSuffixes

    BasicType:
        FundamentalType
        . QualifiedIdentifier
        QualifiedIdentifier
        Typeof
        Typeof . QualifiedIdentifier
-       TypeCtor ( Type )
+       TypeCtor? ( Type )
        Vector
        TraitsExpression
        MixinType

    TypeSuffixes:
        TypeSuffix TypeSuffixes?

    TypeSuffix:
        *
        [ ]
        [ AssignExpression ]
        [ AssignExpression .. AssignExpression ]
        [ Type ]
        delegate Parameters MemberFunctionAttributes?
        function Parameters FunctionAttributes?

    ParameterDeclaration:
        ParameterAttributes? BasicType Declarator
+       ParameterAttributes? LinkageAttribute ref? TypeCtors? BasicType Declarator
        ParameterAttributes? Type

    IfCondition:
        IfConditionStorageClasses Identifier = Expression
        IfConditionStorageClasses? BasicType Declarator = Expression
+       IfConditionStorageClasses? LinkageAttribute ref? TypeCtors? BasicType Declarator = Expression

    ForeachType:
        ForeachTypeAttributes? BasicType Declarator
+       ForeachTypeAttributes? LinkageAttribute ref? TypeCtors? BasicType Declarator
        ForeachTypeAttributes? Identifier
        ForeachTypeAttributes? alias Identifier

[dlang-bot]

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @Bolpat! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

• My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
• My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
• I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
• New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

---

If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Warnings ⚠️⚠️⚠️

• In preparation for migrating from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues, the issue reference syntax has changed. Please add the word "Bugzilla" to issue references. For example, Fix Bugzilla Issue 12345 or Fix Bugzilla 12345.(Reminder: the edit needs to be done in the Git commit message, not the GitHub pull request.)

[dukc]

These two changes seem a bit unrelated to me, but they're small enough that I don't think demanding two separate PRs would be a good idea. And I think both of the changes are themselves correct.