Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
| - [Unsafe Evolution remains a preview feature in .NET 11](#unsafe-evolution-remains-a-preview-feature-in-net-11) | ||
| - [Breaking changes](#breaking-changes) | ||
|
|
||
| ## Unsafe Evolution remains a preview feature in .NET 11 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This title states the obvious. We could re-use it every time and it would still be true.
How about "Unsafe Evolution project adds clearer warnings and errors"?
Also, is the new() constraint specific to Unsafe Evolution?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch. I agree the heading is too generic as written. I'll tighten it to focus on the actual Preview 3 additions, likely along the lines of your suggestion, and I'll re-check whether the new() constraint item is specific enough to keep under the Unsafe Evolution framing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Acted on. I updated the heading to focus on the actual Preview 3 additions, and yes — the new() constraint item is coming from dotnet/roslyn #82647, which is explicitly part of the Unsafe Evolution work.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Roth <daroth@microsoft.com>
2 participants
Summary
changes.jsonandbuild-metadata.jsonThis PR is the fresh manual rerun while the agentic workflow authentication issue is still being debugged.