Skip to content

Conversation

@anderium
Copy link

@anderium anderium commented Jul 12, 2024

Fixes #125 and #126. Builds on top of the commit for the test in PR #127, but that test likely won't pass because this implementation does rename the argument of the inner function. It is likely also safe to skip the replacement entirely if $\epsilon_1$ does not occur in freeInExpressionBody.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant