🧪 [testing improvement] Add test for extract_secrets edge cases#139
Conversation
Co-authored-by: ffalcinelli <1167082+ffalcinelli@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #139 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.04% 92.04%
=======================================
Files 27 27
Lines 2199 2199
=======================================
Hits 2024 2024
Misses 175 175 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
🎯 What: Added tests for missing edge cases in
extract_secrets(null, bool, number, string, empty object, empty array).📊 Coverage: The test ensures that
extract_secretshandles primitive types and empty JSON structures without panicking and accurately leaves the secrets map unmodified.✨ Result: Improved test coverage and reliability of the secret extraction logic for edge-case JSON inputs.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 1060335708594297893 started by @ffalcinelli