fix: add missing spaces in multiline string concatenations

[meetrick]

Description

Thank you for opening a Pull Request!
Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

• Follow the CONTRIBUTING Guide.
• Make your Pull Request title in the https://www.conventionalcommits.org/ specification.
• Ensure the tests and linter pass
• Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Summary

Fix missing whitespace characters in Field description strings that use implicit Python string concatenation across multiple lines.

Changes

File	Before	After
payment_receipt.py	"ISO 8601format."	"ISO 8601 format."
payment_request.py	"useto process"	"use to process"
payment_request.py	"paymentmethod."	"payment method."

Root Cause

Python automatically concatenates adjacent string literals without adding spaces between them. Explicit spaces are required at line boundaries when using parentheses for multiline strings.

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @meetrick, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important formatting issue in Field descriptions within Pydantic models. It rectifies instances where Python's implicit string concatenation across multiple lines resulted in missing whitespace, leading to incorrect or less readable descriptive text. The changes ensure that all descriptions are properly spaced, enhancing clarity and accuracy for API documentation.

Highlights

• Whitespace Correction in payment_receipt.py: A missing space in the timestamp field's description within src/ap2/types/payment_receipt.py has been added to correctly display 'ISO 8601 format'.
• Whitespace Correction in payment_request.py: Missing spaces in a description field within src/ap2/types/payment_request.py have been added to correctly form 'use to process' and 'payment method'.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes issues with missing spaces in multiline string concatenations in pydantic field descriptions. The changes are straightforward and resolve the bugs. I've added a couple of minor suggestions to improve the consistency of how multiline strings are formatted, which is a common convention and can enhance readability.

[gemini-code-assist]

For better readability and to follow a common convention, it's often clearer to place the space at the end of the line that is being continued, rather than at the beginning of the next line.

Suggested change

	"The date and time the payment receipt was created, in ISO 8601"
	"format."
	" format."
	"The date and time the payment receipt was created, in ISO 8601 "
	"format."

[meetrick]

got it.

[meetrick]

Applied it