Skip to content

Conversation

@meetrick
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Remove duplicate 'iat:' prefix in the JWT payload description.

The list item describing JWT timestamp claims had a redundant 'iat:' prefix before 'iat, exp:', making it grammatically incorrect.

Before: "- iat: iat, exp: Timestamps for..."
After: "- iat, exp: Timestamps for..."

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> 🦕

Remove duplicate 'iat:' prefix in the JWT payload description.

The list item describing JWT timestamp claims had a redundant 'iat:'
prefix before 'iat, exp:', making it grammatically incorrect.

Before: "- iat: iat, exp: Timestamps for..."
After:  "- iat, exp: Timestamps for..."

Signed-off-by: Hwangjae Lee <meetrick@gmail.com>
@meetrick meetrick requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2026 01:37
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @meetrick, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the documentation for JWT payload descriptions by correcting a minor grammatical error. The change ensures that the explanation of timestamp claims is precise and avoids redundancy, thereby enhancing the overall readability and accuracy of the project's documentation.

Highlights

  • Documentation Correction: Removed a redundant 'iat:' prefix from the description of JWT timestamp claims (iat, exp) in src/ap2/types/mandate.py to improve grammatical correctness and clarity.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request corrects a minor typo in a docstring within the CartMandate class. The removal of the duplicate 'iat:' prefix improves the clarity of the JWT payload description. The change is accurate and well-contained, improving the overall documentation quality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant