[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 1.26.9 to 2.6.0

[q1blue]

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• requirements-ci.txt

⚠️ Warning

esponses 0.20.0 requires urllib3, which is not installed.
requests 2.27.1 requires urllib3, which is not installed.
flake8 4.0.1 has requirement importlib-metadata<4.3; python_version < "3.8", but you have importlib-metadata 6.7.0.
buildbot 4.3.0 requires autobahn, which is not installed.
buildbot 4.3.0 has requirement unidiff>=0.7.5, but you have unidiff 0.7.3.
botocore 1.21.1 requires urllib3, which is not installed.

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
• Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

---

Important

Upgrade urllib3 to 2.6.0 in requirements-ci.txt to fix security vulnerabilities, with potential compatibility warnings for other dependencies.

• Dependency Upgrade:
  • Upgrade urllib3 from 1.26.9 to 2.6.0 in requirements-ci.txt to fix security vulnerabilities.
• Warnings:
  • Potential compatibility issues with responses, requests, and botocore which require urllib3.

^{This description was created by for 63d16e8. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
buildbot	Error			Dec 11, 2025 4:36am
csb-b6x6kw	Ready	Preview	Comment	Dec 11, 2025 4:36am

[codesandbox]

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders

Open Preview

[bolt-new-by-stackblitz]

Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 63d16e8

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 63d16e8 in 27 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. requirements-ci.txt:108

• Draft comment:
  The upgrade changes urllib3 from 1.26.9 to 2.6.0. Please verify that this major version bump (with potential breaking changes) is compatible with dependent packages (e.g., requests, responses, botocore) used in the project.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to verify compatibility of a major version bump of a dependency with other packages. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to ensure compatibility or verify behavior, which is not allowed.

Workflow ID: wflow_44VlwxzUojqK5pO5

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}