Skip to content

Pseudocode #2

Open
Keerthana-Jayakumaran wants to merge 26 commits intohvram1:masterfrom
Keerthana-Jayakumaran:master
Open

Pseudocode #2
Keerthana-Jayakumaran wants to merge 26 commits intohvram1:masterfrom
Keerthana-Jayakumaran:master

Conversation

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@hvram1 hvram1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test Comment

FOR(EACH Obj in Client_Obj)

FETCH filter variables(assume two values [P1(program_name),IP1(IP address)]);
STORE the filter variable values in local variables(pgmname,ipadd);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are you attempting to do with only 2 variables ? Please generalize

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@hvram1 hvram1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test Comment #2

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

This code needs to know all the property names that the client asking.

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Now i do the changes in the same file. In the previous one pseudocode contains both methods.
in pseudocode1.md contains the code only related to first method. Now i generalized the code.
we can see the existence of that object by checking value for that object is present r not.

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

i made a setup between producer to consumer. Currently doing storage part in server.

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

filtering done for single filter variable and for one client

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Keerthana-Jayakumaran commented Nov 3, 2017

filtering of data done for more than one variable and for one client
I keep telling use the same file . ( Basics of git ). There is no point in doing a version-1 version-1.1 etc. Then you do not need git at all . If you are not clear let us discuss again

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Filtering of data done for more than one filter variable and for multiple clients

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Reading filter variables from file.
comments for the code updated

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

it can be access by more than clients also

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

  • it can be access by more than one client also.

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

updates feature done

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

To send the updates to the respective clients, the clients are identified by the socket id

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Filtering and updating the events for different client requests with different parameters

@Keerthana-Jayakumaran
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Merkle tree with proof. But the proof works for the first record. I am figuring out to do for all the records.
I referred below link to implement the tree and proof
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1176140/Understanding-Merkle-Trees-Why-use-them-who-uses-t

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants