fontbakery check results#2
Open
felipesanches wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
The rendered markdown output can also be seen here: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request is a demonstration of the output of running FontBakery (https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/) on this font project. You don't really need to merge this, but it would be nice to get some feedback from you on the check results and the formatting and usefulness of the information.
I hope this can help you pinpoint some quality issues on the font project. The purpose of the tool is to automate several quality control checks so that the automatically generated report can serve as a useful resource for the designers.
Additionally there's also a hotfixed TrueType font file (with the suffix .ttf) that includes some automatic corrections to some problems detected. It would be nice to validate that these hotfixes are actually good and hopefully useful as well to facilitate your work.