Skip to content

docs(rfc-008): mark P4 DONE (P4d S7+S8 merged)#423

Merged
lantiscooperdev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rfc-008-p4d-status-sync
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

docs(rfc-008): mark P4 DONE (P4d S7+S8 merged)#423
lantiscooperdev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rfc-008-p4d-status-sync

Conversation

@lantisprime

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

RFC-008 P4d doc-sync: mark P4 DONE

S7 (#418) and S8 (#419) are merged, completing P4d and therefore P4. This flips the stale status the prior docs slice (S7) could not self-mark at authoring time.

Changes (status flips only, no code)

Verification

grep -rnE "S7-S8|S8 .*open|IN PROGRESS|P4b.*(remains|reduced|cutover)" over the RFC-008 docs returns only an unrelated historical "v11 review in progress" note; no stale P4 status remains and the S7 CI guard pattern is not tripped.

Rule 10 doc-sync. No code change, no deploy.

S7 (#418) and S8 (#419) are merged, completing P4d and therefore P4 (P4a #397 + P4c #398 + P4d S1-S8 all merged). Flips the stale 'S7-S8 open' / 'IN PROGRESS' status in the RFC body ledger (:1216), the RFC-008/README.md phase matrix (:21), and P4-enforce-config.md status line + the S7/S8 slice-table rows. Rule 10 doc-sync; no code change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

@lantiscooperdev lantiscooperdev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR-level review (bot account): RFC-008 P4d doc-sync

Doc-only status reconciliation, verified against the merged state on main:

  • S7 (#418) and S8 (#419) are both merged; the prior "S7-S8 open" / "IN PROGRESS" P4 status was stale. The three edited files now read DONE consistently (body ledger :1216, README matrix :21, P4-enforce-config.md status line + the S7/S8 slice rows).
  • The S8 slice row honestly notes the required-check toggle is tracked in #420 (the gate is advisory until branch protection is updated), which matches reality.
  • No code, no deploy. The S7 CI guard pattern (P4b.*(remains|reduced|cutover)) is not tripped by the new "superseded" wording.

No issues found. Verdict: ACCEPT (comment-level); maintainer to approve and merge.

@lantiscooperdev lantiscooperdev merged commit 9ab5663 into main Jun 22, 2026
4 checks passed
lantiscooperdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2026
P5 (OpenCode enforcement plugin) merged via #424 (`f5dbaef`) + doc fix
#425 (`a7f66c9`). Flip the stale `queued` P5 status in the three places
that track it, mirroring #423's P4-DONE sync:

- RFC-008/README.md phase matrix: the shared P5-P7 row now reads
  P5 DONE; P6 / P7 queued (Codex, Pi Agent still pending).
- RFC body phase-index stub (:1220): same split.
- P5-P7-tool-plugins.md status line: P5 DONE, P6/P7 queued.

P6/P7 stay queued (shared row/file). RFC-008 remains `accepted` at the
registry level (not all phases shipped), so docs/rfcs/_index.json +
README.md are unchanged; em-rfc-validate passes (8/8/8 consistent).
Rule 10 doc-sync; no code change.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs(rfc-008): refresh phase index for P4d (S1–S4 done) at P4d completion

2 participants