feat(Generalized): prove generalizedBoost_timeComponent_eq#960
Merged
morrison-daniel merged 4 commits intomasterfrom Feb 28, 2026
Merged
feat(Generalized): prove generalizedBoost_timeComponent_eq#960morrison-daniel merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
generalizedBoost_timeComponent_eq#960morrison-daniel merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
morrison-daniel
added
awaiting-author
Co-authored-by: Daniel Morrison <39346894+morrison-daniel@users.noreply.github.com>
morrison-daniel
removed
the
awaiting-author
morrison-daniel
previously approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
Member
|
Adding |
jstoobysmith
added
the
awaiting-author
pitmonticone
removed
the
awaiting-author
Collaborator
|
My suggestion broke it since it looks like the hypothesis was getting modified implicitly, so I'm reverting to the original and it should be back to working. |
morrison-daniel
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds proofs autoformalised by @Aristotle-Harmonic.
The original statement used
‖...‖(norm) but the correct formula uses‖...‖ ^ 2(norm squared). A numerical counterexample for the original: u = (1,0), v = (cosh 1, sinh 1)
gives LHS = cosh 1 ≈ 1.543 but RHS with
‖·‖≈ 1.462.Co-authored-by: Aristotle (Harmonic) aristotle-harmonic@harmonic.fun