Skip to content

chore: backtick identifiers in compiler diagnostics #11839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
alok wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: backtick identifiers in compiler diagnostics #11839

alok wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@alok
Copy link
Contributor

@alok alok commented Dec 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR uses backticks instead of single quotes for identifiers in compiler diagnostic messages, following Lean's convention for referring to identifiers in error messages.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

alok and others added 2 commits December 29, 2025 20:22
@alok alok marked this pull request as ready for review January 1, 2026 22:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Jan 1, 2026
@leanprover-community-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-community-bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the nightly-testing-2025-12-30 tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto nightly-with-mathlib, Mathlib CI should run now. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2026-01-01 23:13:17)

leanprover-bot added a commit to leanprover/reference-manual that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2026
@leanprover-bot
Update lean-toolchain for testing leanprover/lean4#11839
7e5376a
@leanprover-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-bot commented Jan 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Reference manual CI status:

@leanprover-bot leanprover-bot added the breaks-manual This is not necessarily a blocker for merging, but there needs to be a plan. label Jan 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@leodemoura leodemoura Awaiting requested review from leodemoura leodemoura is a code owner

@hargoniX hargoniX Awaiting requested review from hargoniX hargoniX is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

breaks-manual This is not necessarily a blocker for merging, but there needs to be a plan. toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@alok @leanprover-community-bot @leanprover-bot