added tests#1103
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution is approved because the core splitInteger implementation correctly satisfies the task’s functional requirements: it returns an array of integers of the requested length, sorted ascending, with the difference between the maximum and minimum elements never exceeding 1. The existing tests in src/splitInteger.test.js already exercise key behaviors such as equal splits, single-part splits, ordering, and the value < numberOfParts case, and they are consistent with the described algorithm.
The main missing pieces are not critical blockers but opportunities to strengthen your test coverage. Specifically, consider adding a dedicated test for the documented example splitInteger(32, 6) to assert [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6], and optionally a more general test that checks Math.max(parts) - Math.min(parts) <= 1 across a range of input values. You could also add a small test for splitInteger(6, 2) to fully mirror all examples in the task description. Overall, you’ve implemented the required functionality well; tightening the tests will further improve confidence in your solution.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('should sort parts ascending if they are not equal', () => {}); | ||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The task description includes an explicit example splitInteger(32, 6) === [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6], but there is no corresponding test here; consider adding a test case for that example to fully cover the specified behavior.
No description provided.