Changed DoubleBuffer allocation

[vaaale]

To accommodate larger vocabs

[markhull]

Just to throw my 2 cents worth in, I'm using the result of a big run which has vocab size = 4,889,031 and layer size = 500, the product of which is still > MAXINT. This will exceed your new buffer calculation as well and still cause a Negative Capacity error, if I'm reading the docs correctly.

[dirkgr]

Why does this have so many changes? Did you change the indentation of that file?

[vaaale]

Hi.

Didn't mean to do so, but IntelliJ might have done it automatically. The
only change I made was to the buffer allocation to accommodate lager models.

Best

Alex

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Dirk Groeneveld notifications@github.com
wrote:

Why does this have so many changes? Did you change the indentation of that
file?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#37 (comment)