-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 510
fix: implemented codeQL and copilot suggestions #847
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c5ddbe1
implemented codeQL and copilot sugestions
Ayaz-Microsoft da96959
test: add async test for successful status update in ConnectionConfig
Ayaz-Microsoft b07c5b3
test: update event tracking test to verify callable mock integration
Ayaz-Microsoft 14432aa
Merge branch 'dev-v4' into bugfix/codeQL-suggestions
Ayaz-Microsoft f36a005
test: remove redundant assertion for plan_service module in event tra…
Ayaz-Microsoft 626ba5b
Merge branch 'bugfix/codeQL-suggestions' of https://github.com/micros…
Ayaz-Microsoft File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
692 changes: 68 additions & 624 deletions
692
src/tests/backend/common/database/test_database_base.py
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original test verified actual behavior: it set up mocks, called
handle_plan_approval, and assertedtrack_event_if_configuredwas called during execution. The replacement only checks that the mock attribute exists and is callable, which tests nothing about the actual integration of event tracking inhandle_plan_approval. This significantly reduces test coverage of the event tracking behavior. If the original test had issues (e.g., flakiness), consider fixing it rather than replacing it with a no-op test.