Skip to content

fix(memory): add 'type' to schemas and use passthrough for Gemini CLI… #3149

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ericnjurio wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+6 −2
Open

fix(memory): add 'type' to schemas and use passthrough for Gemini CLI… #3149

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
9da1f19
fix(memory): add 'type' to schemas and use passthrough for Gemini CLI…
ericnjurio Dec 23, 2025
9264308
Update src/memory/index.ts
ericnjurio Jan 19, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions src/memory/index.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,12 +48,14 @@ let MEMORY_FILE_PATH: string;

// We are storing our memory using entities, relations, and observations in a graph structure
export interface Entity {
type?: string;
Copy link
Member

@domdomegg domdomegg Jan 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we just change this to the const "entity" and relation to "relation"?

name: string;
entityType: string;
observations: string[];
}

export interface Relation {
type?: string;
from: string;
to: string;
relationType: string;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -237,16 +239,18 @@ let knowledgeGraphManager: KnowledgeGraphManager;

// Zod schemas for entities and relations
const EntitySchema = z.object({
type: z.string().optional().describe("Internal type discriminator (entity)"),
name: z.string().describe("The name of the entity"),
entityType: z.string().describe("The type of the entity"),
observations: z.array(z.string()).describe("An array of observation contents associated with the entity")
});
}).passthrough();
Copy link
Member

@domdomegg domdomegg Jan 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not convinced we should have this passthrough() declaration - if we already have type declared does this sort out the schema situation? I worry that passthrough could lead to silent errors & schema drift


const RelationSchema = z.object({
type: z.string().optional().describe("Internal type discriminator (relation)"),
from: z.string().describe("The name of the entity where the relation starts"),
to: z.string().describe("The name of the entity where the relation ends"),
relationType: z.string().describe("The type of the relation")
});
}).passthrough();

// The server instance and tools exposed to Claude
const server = new McpServer({
Expand Down