Skip to content

Conversation

@gwansikk
Copy link
Member

Potential fix for https://github.com/offlegacy/git-intent/security/code-scanning/8

In general, this type of problem is fixed by explicitly declaring a permissions block for the workflow or for each job, restricting the GITHUB_TOKEN to only the scopes actually needed. For a code‑quality workflow that only checks out code and runs local analysis, contents: read is typically sufficient.

For this specific workflow in .github/workflows/code-quality.yml, the simplest, non‑breaking fix is to add a root‑level permissions block (applies to all jobs) with contents: read. The job only needs to read the repository contents (via actions/checkout@v4) and does not require any write access or other scopes. No other permissions (like pull-requests or issues) are needed based on the current steps.

You should edit .github/workflows/code-quality.yml to insert:

permissions:
  contents: read

between the name: and on: keys (or alternatively between on: and jobs:; root level is what matters). No imports or additional methods are needed, since this is a YAML configuration change only.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@gwansikk gwansikk changed the title Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 8: Workflow does not contain permissions fix(ci): workflow does not contain permissions Dec 28, 2025
@gwansikk gwansikk self-assigned this Dec 28, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

@gwansikk gwansikk requested a review from kangju2000 December 28, 2025 10:15
@gwansikk gwansikk marked this pull request as ready for review December 28, 2025 10:26
@gwansikk
Copy link
Member Author

The CI error has been fixed here. Please review the corresponding PR first.

#46

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants