refactor(asset-to-owner): Use more user centric error messages

[zkdev]

This error is end-user facing.
Let's be less technical and drop details.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

If automatic issue assignment fails, there is now a more meaningful and user friendly message added as comment.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 75ecb399-f1d0-4ed2-b1cd-0c2a372ebe06

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53189e5 and 73196ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/components.py
• src/issue_replicator/github.py

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two user-facing error/status message strings are updated. In ComponentResponsibles.get, the message for the user_identities is None case is replaced with text describing a GitHub limitation and instructions for manual assignment. In create_issue, the introductory sentence and markdown table headers for the assignment-problems comment are renamed from Message Type/Message to Status/Details.

Changes

Assignee Error Message Text Updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Updated assignee status/error message text src/components.py, src/issue_replicator/github.py	ComponentResponsibles.get replaces the heuristic/incomplete-statistics error message with a GitHub-limitation description and manual assignment guidance. create_issue updates the assignment-problems comment intro sentence and renames markdown table columns from Message Type/Message to Status/Details.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hopped in, quill in paw,
Found some old messages full of flaw.
"Status and Details," the new headers say,
"GitHub's to blame — assign manually today!"
Clearer words now light the way. 🐇✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: making error messages more user-centric in the asset-to-owner component.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description includes most required sections with relevant details about the change and release notes, though the 'What this PR does' section is incomplete.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[8R0WNI3]

/lgtm

[adenitiu]

/lgtm