Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, @mgwozdz-unicon! This repository is currently maintained by Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review. 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Submit a signed contributor agreement (CLA)
If you've signed an agreement in the past, you may need to re-sign. Once you've signed the CLA, please allow 1 business day for it to be processed. 🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Update the status of your PRYour PR is currently marked as a draft. After completing the steps above, update its status by clicking "Ready for Review", or removing "WIP" from the title, as appropriate. Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources: When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
42ee130 to
e136f83
Compare
Description
Related ADRs: #466
This is for a backend POC of an end-to-end CBE Assessment Criteria workflow.
competency_tagvalue. For example:competency_tagvalue and the primary key id of the object_tag association as theobject_tagvalue as well as the primary key id of the Assessment Criteria Group as thegroupvalue. For example:Supporting information
Related Technical Design Document: https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OEPM/pages/5604573185/Competency+Assessment+Criteria+Technical+Design+Document
Testing instructions
For manual testing:
This needs to be run in the CMS because the LMS does not contain openedx-learning as a dependency.
Once this change and the corresponding changes for the edx-platform repo are in place and db migrations are completed, then you can proceed with the testing steps described above in the description.
Deadline
It would be great to have some feedback within the next week or two.
Other information
Depends on the changes here: