Skip to content

[Provers N09] Update docs#94

Merged
luiz-lvj merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/provers-N09
Feb 24, 2026
Merged

[Provers N09] Update docs#94
luiz-lvj merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/provers-N09

Conversation

@luiz-lvj
Copy link
Collaborator

@luiz-lvj luiz-lvj commented Feb 24, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated inline documentation in smart contracts. No functional changes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 24, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@luiz-lvj has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 21 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce556f4 and 815d089.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/contracts/provers/zksync/ParentToChildProver.sol
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation refinements to two prover contracts: removed a comment about storage slot details in Scroll implementation and improved inline parameter documentation in Zksync implementation. No functional or behavioral changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Scroll ParentToChildProver
src/contracts/provers/scroll/ParentToChildProver.sol
Removed comment describing finalizedStateRoots mapping slot as slot 7; no logic or control flow changes.
Zksync ParentToChildProver
src/contracts/provers/zksync/ParentToChildProver.sol
Updated documentation for verifyTargetStateCommitment input parameters to separately document accountProof and storageProof instead of a generic proof reference.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • nahimterrazas
  • pepebndc

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through docs so neat,
Tidying comments, keeping lines sweet,
No logic changed, just words refined,
Clarity blooms in each reworded line!
✨ 📝

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title '[Provers N09] Update docs' accurately summarizes the changeset, which consists entirely of documentation updates to two Prover contracts.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/provers-N09

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@src/contracts/provers/zksync/ParentToChildProver.sol`:
- Around line 118-122: Update the param tuple signature comment so it matches
the actual abi.decode usage: include the missing bytes accountProof element in
the tuple description (the comment that currently lists (bytes rlpBlockHeader,
uint256 batchNumber, bytes storageProof) should be changed to include bytes
accountProof), ensuring the docblock for the input parameter in
ParentToChildProver.sol aligns with the abi.decode call that decodes four values
(rlpBlockHeader, batchNumber, accountProof, storageProof).

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7714c79 and ce556f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/contracts/provers/scroll/ParentToChildProver.sol
  • src/contracts/provers/zksync/ParentToChildProver.sol
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/contracts/provers/scroll/ParentToChildProver.sol

@luiz-lvj luiz-lvj requested a review from pepebndc February 24, 2026 17:37
@luiz-lvj luiz-lvj requested a review from frangio February 24, 2026 19:21
@luiz-lvj luiz-lvj merged commit 3dc2412 into main Feb 24, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants