Skip to content

OCPBUGS-80133: Bump google.golang.org/grpc#543

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.17from
sbiradar10:OCPBUGS-80133
May 11, 2026
Merged

OCPBUGS-80133: Bump google.golang.org/grpc#543
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.17from
sbiradar10:OCPBUGS-80133

Conversation

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tracker: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-80133

Bump grpc to sustaining grpc fork to avoid go version bump

used below command:
go mod edit -replace google.golang.org/grpc=github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.71.3-sec.1

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sbiradar10: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80133, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80308 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Tracker: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-80133

Bump grpc to sustaining grpc fork to avoid go version bump

used below command:
go mod edit -replace google.golang.org/grpc=github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.71.3-sec.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 34e789e1-05e9-483e-af3f-914a87b9f823

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from dobsonj and mpatlasov April 10, 2026 19:34
@sbiradar10
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/test e2e-azure-file-nfs-csi

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 11, 2026

@sbiradar10: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mpatlasov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbiradar10 , should this PR wait for similar fix to be merged in 4.18 first?

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

hey @mpatlasov yes but you can still review this and assign required label. I will do jira refresh once 4.18 is in verified state. Thank you

@mpatlasov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hey @mpatlasov yes but you can still review this and assign required label.

"assign required label" -- is it /label <sth> <sth>?

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 16, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mpatlasov, sbiradar10

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 16, 2026
@jkaurredhat
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 22, 2026
@jsafrane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jsafrane commented May 5, 2026

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label May 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jsafrane: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kunalmemane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kunalmemane: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80133, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kunalmemane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 11, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kunalmemane: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80133, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80308 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80308 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 11, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 91f5685 into openshift:release-4.17 May 11, 2026
18 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sbiradar10: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80133: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:

All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-80133 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload.

Details

In response to this:

Tracker: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-80133

Bump grpc to sustaining grpc fork to avoid go version bump

used below command:
go mod edit -replace google.golang.org/grpc=github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go@v1.71.3-sec.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants