Skip to content

Conversation

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator

@wk989898 wk989898 commented Dec 30, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #3761 close #3851

What is changed and how it works?

  • Function Renaming: The function IsTableTriggerEventDispatcher has been consistently renamed to IsTableTriggerDispatcher across the codebase for improved clarity and conciseness.
  • Redo Dispatcher Bug Fix: A potential null pointer dereference in the UpdateRedoMeta function of the redo dispatcher has been addressed by adding a check to ensure the TableTriggerRedoDispatcher exists before attempting to update its metadata.
  • Grafana Dashboard Enhancement: Grafana dashboards have been updated to include event_type in the legend format for several dispatcher-related metrics, providing more granular monitoring.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

Please refer to [Release Notes Language Style Guide](https://pingcap.github.io/tidb-dev-guide/contribute-to-tidb/release-notes-style-guide.html) to write a quality release note.

If you don't think this PR needs a release note then fill it with `None`.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Dec 30, 2025
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Dec 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign charlescheung96 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 30, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @wk989898, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on improving code clarity and robustness within the dispatcher components, particularly concerning redo logs. It introduces a more concise naming convention for a key dispatcher function and patches a critical bug that could lead to panics when updating redo metadata. Additionally, it enhances the monitoring capabilities by refining Grafana dashboard legends to provide more detailed insights into event dispatcher counts and creation durations.

Highlights

  • Function Renaming: The function IsTableTriggerEventDispatcher has been consistently renamed to IsTableTriggerDispatcher across the codebase for improved clarity and conciseness.
  • Redo Dispatcher Bug Fix: A potential null pointer dereference in the UpdateRedoMeta function of the redo dispatcher has been addressed by adding a check to ensure the TableTriggerRedoDispatcher exists before attempting to update its metadata.
  • Grafana Dashboard Enhancement: Grafana dashboards have been updated to include event_type in the legend format for several dispatcher-related metrics, providing more granular monitoring.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test all

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request primarily consists of a refactoring that renames IsTableTriggerEventDispatcher to IsTableTriggerDispatcher for consistency, alongside a bug fix in the redo dispatcher logic. The fix corrects the function used for checking an existing table trigger redo dispatcher and moves the nil-check for this dispatcher to the caller. While this resolves an incorrect error log, removing the nil-check from the UpdateRedoMeta function itself could lead to panics if it's called from other locations in the future. I've included a critical comment to address this potential robustness issue. The updates to the Grafana dashboards to incorporate event_type in metrics are also noted and look good.

Comment on lines 265 to 266
e.GetTableTriggerRedoDispatcher().UpdateMeta(checkpointTs, resolvedTs)
return

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Removing the nil check for GetTableTriggerRedoDispatcher() introduces a risk of a nil pointer dereference if this function is called from a context where the dispatcher might not exist. While the only current caller in helper.go now performs this check, it's safer to make this function robust against such panics to prevent potential issues in the future. I recommend restoring the nil check within this function for better defensiveness.

if dispatcher := e.GetTableTriggerRedoDispatcher(); dispatcher != nil {
	dispatcher.UpdateMeta(checkpointTs, resolvedTs)
}

@wk989898 wk989898 added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 31, 2025
@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test all

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

1 similar comment
@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

1 similar comment
@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wk989898 commented Jan 6, 2026

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@wk989898
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wk989898 commented Jan 6, 2026

/test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@wk989898: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-error-log-review 3216fc8 link true /test pull-error-log-review
pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy 3216fc8 link true /test pull-cdc-mysql-integration-heavy

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cdc new arch: CDC changefeed lag continues to rise when using redo sync ddl. new arch: remove cdc changefeed with redo failed

1 participant