Revert "Simplify multifurcation resolution in the stepwise inference tutorial"#147
Merged
Merged
Conversation
bredelings
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2026
Contributor
bredelings
left a comment
bredelings
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reverting to a working state seems like a good idea.
If we had a test for this tutorial, we might have caught this earlier, but creating a test looks a bit tricky.
github-actions Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2026
…es-2 Revert "Simplify multifurcation resolution in the stepwise inference tutorial" 01e3caf
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #55.
This is a temporary solution to make the tutorial work with the current version of RevBayes (v1.4.0), before we find a more elegant way of rooting unrooted trees and integrate it into the next release.