docs: add CODEOWNERS for default review ownership#560
Conversation
|
Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the ritik4ever's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe ChangesCODEOWNERS Default Owner Assignment
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment Warning |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CODEOWNERS`:
- Line 2: The CODEOWNERS entry contains an invalid GitHub owner string
"`@espcris05`" which causes GitHub to ignore the rule; update the line that
currently reads "* `@espcris05`" to use a valid GitHub username or an existing
organization/team handle (e.g., replace "`@espcris05`" with a known user or an
org/team like "`@your-org/your-team`") so GitHub can correctly assign reviewers;
ensure the replacement owner actually exists and is accessible to the repo.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| # Default code owners | |||
| * @espcris05 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `@espcris05` is a valid GitHub user
# Check if user exists via GitHub API
gh api /users/espcris05 --jq '.login' || echo "User not found"
# Also check if user has access to this repository
gh api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators/espcris05 --jq '.login' 2>/dev/null || echo "User is not a collaborator (may still work if user is in the org)"Repository: ritik4ever/stellar-stream
Length of output: 408
🌐 Web query:
espcris05 github username
💡 Result:
As of June 1, 2026, there is no publicly indexed GitHub user account with the exact username "espcris05". Searches for this specific handle do not return a valid GitHub profile page. It is possible that the username is misspelled, private, or has been deleted. Similar usernames found on GitHub include: - espre05 (https://github.com/espre05) [1] - krish05 (https://github.com/krish05) [2] - krishs05 (https://github.com/krishs05) [3] - CrisEspi91 (https://github.com/CrisEspi91) [4] If you believe this account should exist, please verify the spelling or check the platform where you originally encountered the username.
Citations:
- 1: https://github.com/espre05
- 2: https://github.com/krish05
- 3: https://github.com/krishs05
- 4: https://github.com/CrisEspi91
Fix invalid CODEOWNERS owner @espcris05
CODEOWNERS sets * @espcris05``, but @espcris05 doesn’t exist on GitHub (GitHub API 404 / no public profile), so GitHub ignores the CODEOWNERS rule and won’t request review automatically. Replace it with a valid user or an existing org/team handle.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@CODEOWNERS` at line 2, The CODEOWNERS entry contains an invalid GitHub owner
string "`@espcris05`" which causes GitHub to ignore the rule; update the line that
currently reads "* `@espcris05`" to use a valid GitHub username or an existing
organization/team handle (e.g., replace "`@espcris05`" with a known user or an
org/team like "`@your-org/your-team`") so GitHub can correctly assign reviewers;
ensure the replacement owner actually exists and is accessible to the repo.
1 participant
Adding a CODEOWNERS file so that all new pull requests default to @espcris05 for review.
Part of ongoing Stellar Wave contribution sprint.
Summary by CodeRabbit