enable `rust_2018_idioms` lint group for doctests by onur-ozkan · Pull Request #106621 · rust-lang/rust

onur-ozkan · 2023-01-09T06:32:12Z

With this change, rust_2018_idioms lint group will be enabled for compiler/libstd doctests.

Resolves #106086
Resolves #99144

Signed-off-by: ozkanonur work@onurozkan.dev

rustbot · 2023-01-09T06:32:20Z

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

rustbot · 2023-01-09T06:32:24Z

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

Stabilizing library features
Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

src/librustdoc/doctest.rs

jyn514 · 2023-01-09T23:08:39Z

@ozkanonur you should fix the warnings - if it's a lot of effort, we can split it up by crate on the original issue and ask for volunteers to help fix the issues.

jyn514

The compiler changes look good to me, but we should probably have someone from libs sign off on the changes to the public docs.

src/bootstrap/compile.rs

jyn514 · 2023-01-10T21:26:54Z

r? libs

@cuviper Do the changes to the standard library documentation look like an improvement?

GuillaumeGomez · 2023-04-28T09:32:03Z

compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs

If it was compiling before, why not add a hidden import instead?

why not add a hidden import instead?

There are multiple errors, and one of them was:

error: unconstrained opaque type --> src/lib.rs:1488:30 | 4 | type TestReturn<'a, 'x, T> = impl Debug + 'x; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `TestReturn` must be used in combination with a concrete type within the same item

GuillaumeGomez · 2023-04-28T09:32:11Z

compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs

If it was compiling before, why not add a hidden import instead?

It's using dummy type defined on the previous doc-comment which is also ignored.

GuillaumeGomez · 2023-04-28T09:32:21Z

compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/deriving/generic/mod.rs

Why ignoring this one?

#106621 (comment)

Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>

onur-ozkan · 2023-05-06T21:39:09Z

@rustbot ready

Mark-Simulacrum · 2023-05-06T22:14:27Z

@bors r+

bors · 2023-05-06T22:14:29Z

📌 Commit 4e7c14f has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2023-05-08T04:50:31Z

⌛ Testing commit 4e7c14f with merge ea0c22e...

bors · 2023-05-08T07:35:21Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing ea0c22e to master...

rust-timer · 2023-05-08T08:51:11Z

Finished benchmarking commit (ea0c22e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.5%	[4.1%, 5.3%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.5%	[-5.5%, -2.4%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.7%	[-2.7%, 5.3%]	4

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: missing data

Update doc for `PhantomData` to match code example After rust-lang#106621, there is no longer a `T: 'a` annotation in the doc example, so update the text to match the code.

Update doc for `PhantomData` to match code example After rust-lang/rust#106621, there is no longer a `T: 'a` annotation in the doc example, so update the text to match the code.

rustbot assigned m-ou-se Jan 9, 2023

Noratrieb reviewed Jan 9, 2023

View reviewed changes

src/librustdoc/doctest.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

rustbot added the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Jan 9, 2023

onur-ozkan force-pushed the enable-elided-lifetimes-for-doctests branch from c25110c to 91178d2 Compare January 9, 2023 15:03

onur-ozkan requested a review from Noratrieb January 9, 2023 15:03

onur-ozkan commented Jan 9, 2023

View reviewed changes

src/librustdoc/doctest.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

jyn514 assigned jyn514 and unassigned m-ou-se Jan 9, 2023

jyn514 added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 9, 2023

onur-ozkan force-pushed the enable-elided-lifetimes-for-doctests branch from 4580785 to 910829f Compare January 10, 2023 07:00

onur-ozkan requested review from jyn514 and mejrs and removed request for Noratrieb and mejrs January 10, 2023 07:23

jyn514 reviewed Jan 10, 2023

View reviewed changes

src/bootstrap/compile.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

jyn514 added A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools and removed T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 10, 2023

rustbot assigned cuviper and unassigned jyn514 Jan 10, 2023

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. labels Apr 27, 2023

GuillaumeGomez reviewed Apr 28, 2023

View reviewed changes

Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2023

enable rust_2018_idioms for doctests

4e7c14f

Signed-off-by: ozkanonur <work@onurozkan.dev>

onur-ozkan force-pushed the enable-elided-lifetimes-for-doctests branch from 9e811dd to 4e7c14f Compare May 6, 2023 21:12

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 6, 2023

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 6, 2023

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 8, 2023

bors merged commit ea0c22e into rust-lang:master May 8, 2023

rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 8, 2023

onur-ozkan deleted the enable-elided-lifetimes-for-doctests branch May 8, 2023 09:16

This was referenced May 8, 2023

Rust ast lowering doc tests #106486

Closed

Rustc infer doctest #106523

Closed

99144 enable doctests #106574

Closed

lukas-code mentioned this pull request May 14, 2023

Update doc for PhantomData to match code example #102673

Merged

Uh oh!

Conversation

onur-ozkan commented Jan 9, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jan 9, 2023

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Jan 9, 2023

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment was marked as resolved.

jyn514 commented Jan 9, 2023

Uh oh!

jyn514 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jyn514 commented Jan 10, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

onur-ozkan commented May 6, 2023

Uh oh!

Mark-Simulacrum commented May 6, 2023

Uh oh!

bors commented May 6, 2023

Uh oh!

bors commented May 8, 2023

Uh oh!

bors commented May 8, 2023

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented May 8, 2023

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

13 participants

onur-ozkan commented Jan 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

jyn514 commented Jan 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading