Add another test for hidden types capturing lifetimes that outlive but arent mentioned in substs#126004
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 5, 2024
Merged
Conversation
…t arent mentioned in substs
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 101. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123168 (Add `size_of` and `size_of_val` and `align_of` and `align_of_val` to the prelude) - rust-lang#125273 (bootstrap: implement new feature `bootstrap-self-test`) - rust-lang#125683 (Rewrite `suspicious-library`, `resolve-rename` and `incr-prev-body-beyond-eof` `run-make` tests in `rmake.rs` format) - rust-lang#125815 (`rustc_parse` top-level cleanups) - rust-lang#125903 (rustc_span: Inline some hot functions) - rust-lang#125906 (Remove a bunch of redundant args from `report_method_error`) - rust-lang#125920 (Allow static mut definitions with #[linkage]) - rust-lang#125982 (Make deleting on LinkedList aware of the allocator) - rust-lang#125995 (Use inline const blocks to create arrays of `MaybeUninit`.) - rust-lang#125996 (Closures are recursively reachable) - rust-lang#126003 (Add a co-maintainer for the two ARMv4T targets) - rust-lang#126004 (Add another test for hidden types capturing lifetimes that outlive but arent mentioned in substs) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126004 - compiler-errors:captures-soundness-test, r=lcnr Add another test for hidden types capturing lifetimes that outlive but arent mentioned in substs Another test to make sure future implementations of rust-lang#116040 don't have any subtle unsoundness 🤔 r? types
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another test to make sure future implementations of #116040 don't have any subtle unsoundness 🤔
r? types