Skip to content

Conversation

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

... in macro invocations.

Issue: <rust-lang#149692>.
(cherry picked from commit 31531b3)
There's no sensible recovery scheme here, giving up the recovery is the
right thing to do.

(cherry picked from commit 79c4727)
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 27, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 27, 2026

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
##[group]Runner Image Provisioner
Hosted Compute Agent
Version: 20260115.477
Commit: 4b342d620503cbe250a3154040964899ea7c9b00
Build Date: 2026-01-15T22:32:41Z
Worker ID: {b8761893-0596-4121-ba9a-7fbddda34362}
Azure Region: westcentralus
##[endgroup]
##[group]Operating System
Ubuntu
24.04.3
LTS

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the stable-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the stable channel. label Jan 27, 2026
@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor

mu001999 commented Jan 27, 2026

I think we should also backport #151249

@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mu001999 could you elaborate on why at the backport stream? #t-compiler/backports > #150590: stable-nominated

@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

stable backport accepted during t-compiler triage, though we don't feel it deserve in isolation a dot release.

@rustbot label +stable-accepted

@rustbot rustbot added the stable-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the stable channel. label Jan 29, 2026
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Feb 5, 2026

(I'm going to close this in favor of a stable backport rollup that contains #150590, which is already tagged stable-accepted, since the stable backport will need to backport a clippy fix too I think)

@jieyouxu jieyouxu closed this Feb 5, 2026
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 5, 2026
@tgross35 tgross35 deleted the backport-kw-recovery branch February 5, 2026 02:38
@cuviper cuviper removed the stable-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the stable channel. label Feb 10, 2026
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.93.1 milestone Feb 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

stable-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the stable channel. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants