-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
[EXPERIMENT] How much perf is there to win in translation? #152363
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[EXPERIMENT] How much perf is there to win in translation?
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #152358) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (d6d8da7): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 3.5%, secondary 4.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 2.8%, secondary 5.2%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 473.129s -> 475.728s (0.55%) |
No description provided.