Skip to content

Split catalog fixes nojax#43

Open
talonmyburgh wants to merge 45 commits intomasterfrom
SplitCatalog_fixes_nojax
Open

Split catalog fixes nojax#43
talonmyburgh wants to merge 45 commits intomasterfrom
SplitCatalog_fixes_nojax

Conversation

@talonmyburgh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR:

Fixes issues #32 #33 #34

Also fixed to calculate the randomly generated off targets using a CoordMachine (as suggested by @cyriltasse). There is also some debug so that if targets in the srclist are outside the rad, a message mentions this.

Finally, there is now a --stokes parameter that takes in a str ("I", "IV", "IQUV" etc). This is quite a performance bump (saving ~30-40% of time and RAM) when the dataset was not calibrated for polarisation (currently the state in tron pipeline). Naturally if parameters U or V are specified, the performance bump goes away as we then need all correlation products. If ignored this parameter defaults to "IQUV".
PS. In making the stokes parameter upgrade, the saved FITS files are also smaller for subsets of IQUV. But this does mean they are non-standard - i.e. ds9 and casa will be angry - however inspect-dynspec is developed to handle these subsets correctly.

talonmyburgh and others added 30 commits August 1, 2025 11:41
Pull in changes from master
Bring in corrections made in patch_no_sources
fix(kronicle_rims_Schema.py): RimsObservationPayload
fix(kronicle_rims_schema.py): adjustments
OlivierMartineau and others added 15 commits March 19, 2026 13:42
Add rims publishing functionality and cli changes
…blem reading <blah>.ms: Missing Data colname FAKE_DATA
Custom Directory + Single MS: drops the files precisely into OutDirName
Custom Directory + Multiple MSs: detects the multiple MS states and automatically creates safe subdirectories inside OutDirName

#32
…n setting stokes=I or IQ or Q vs standard as have to collect half the correlation products.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <copilot@github.com>
@talonmyburgh talonmyburgh requested a review from cyriltasse May 7, 2026 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants