Skip to content

[codex] Make profile rank more prominent#74

Open
B-EtterDigital wants to merge 1 commit into
sculptdotfun:mainfrom
B-EtterDigital:feature/prominent-profile-rank-2026-06-18
Open

[codex] Make profile rank more prominent#74
B-EtterDigital wants to merge 1 commit into
sculptdotfun:mainfrom
B-EtterDigital:feature/prominent-profile-rank-2026-06-18

Conversation

@B-EtterDigital

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Promote the achieved global rank from a small inline chip to a prominent profile-header element.
  • Re-label the profile rank stat as Viberank position and keep the unranked state explicit.
  • Add a small helper and regression test for rank display formatting.

Validation

  • node test/profile-rank.test.mts passes: 6 tests.
  • pnpm test passes: 19 existing ccusage tests and 6 profile rank tests.
  • git diff --check and git diff --cached --check pass.
  • GITHUB_ID=dummy GITHUB_SECRET=dummy NEXTAUTH_SECRET=dummy-secret NEXTAUTH_URL=http://localhost:3000 pnpm build compiles successfully, then fails prerendering /hire because Supabase server env vars are not configured locally.

Scope

Feature-only PR. It intentionally does not include PR #72 bug fixes, PR #73 expandable model list changes, or custom open-to-work email handling.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@B-EtterDigital is attempting to deploy a commit to the sculpt Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@B-EtterDigital B-EtterDigital force-pushed the feature/prominent-profile-rank-2026-06-18 branch 2 times, most recently from 05a8aed to 990a714 Compare June 18, 2026 14:37
@B-EtterDigital B-EtterDigital force-pushed the feature/prominent-profile-rank-2026-06-18 branch from 990a714 to 5608997 Compare June 18, 2026 14:51
@B-EtterDigital B-EtterDigital marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2026 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant