Skip to content

refactoring some naming + adding tenantID#420

Merged
patrickhuie19 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/metering-naming-tenant
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

refactoring some naming + adding tenantID#420
patrickhuie19 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/metering-naming-tenant

Conversation

@patrickhuie19

@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Numeric tenantID is used across the centralized services.

Aligns on naming from discussion started here:smartcontractkit/chainlink-common#2158 (comment)

Not used in prod or consumed anywhere yet; breaking changes have no impact.

...ID = one scalar string
...Identity = a struct grouping multiple dimensions

@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 requested review from a team as code owners July 6, 2026 18:51
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 467c5a9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow Regenerate Protobuf Files / buf (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed✅ passed⏩ skippedJul 6, 2026, 6:57 PM

@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 merged commit 873029f into main Jul 6, 2026
23 checks passed
@patrickhuie19 patrickhuie19 deleted the fix/metering-naming-tenant branch July 6, 2026 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants