Use reusable Splunk agreements workflow#47
Closed
jcsco wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
bchhay-splunk
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #46
Before the change?
contributor-assistant/github-action@v2.3.0.splunk/cla-agreementwithCould not retrieve repository contents. Status: 401.After the change?
reusable-agreements.yaml@v1.7.2workflow, following the pattern used bysplunk-connect-for-snmp.PAT_CLATOOLsecret to the reusable workflow'sPERSONAL_ACCESS_TOKENinput.contributor-assistant/github-action@v2.6.1through the pinned reusable workflow.Pull request checklist
actionlint v1.7.7Validation Output
The agreement jobs on this PR will still use the existing base-branch workflow because
pull_request_targetloads workflow definitions from the base branch. The reusable workflow will take effect after this change is merged.Does this introduce a breaking change?