Complete Design-2

[PrakarshKamal]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

Strengths:

• The implementation of the queue using two stacks is correct and efficient.
• The code is well-structured and easy to understand.
• Time and space complexities are optimal.

Areas for Improvement:

• The class should be named "MyQueue" as per the problem statement. The current name "QueueUsingStacks" might not be accepted by an automated testing system that expects the class name "MyQueue".
• Consider reducing code duplication: The transfer logic (moving from inStack to outStack) is repeated in both pop and peek. You can refactor by having peek handle the transfer and then pop can call peek and then pop from outStack. For example:
  public int pop() {
  int top = peek();
  outStack.pop();
  return top;
  }
  This way, the transfer logic is only in peek.
• Ensure that you are only submitting the required solution for the problem. The DesignHashMap.java file is not part of this problem and should not be included.