Skip to content

Completed s30 Trees-3#1589

Open
prenastro wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
prenastro:master
Open

Completed s30 Trees-3#1589
prenastro wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
prenastro:master

Conversation

@prenastro

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Path Sum II (pathsum2.py)

Strengths:

  • Excellent use of backtracking pattern - clean and correct
  • Efficient memory usage with in-place path modification and selective copying
  • Well-commented code with clear explanation of the algorithm
  • Time complexity analysis is accurate and shows good understanding

Areas for Improvement:

  • The space complexity analysis could be more precise. In the worst case (skewed tree), the recursion stack is O(n), not O(h). For a balanced tree, it's O(log n).
  • Consider adding type hints for better code documentation (e.g., def pathSum(self, root: Optional[TreeNode], targetSum: int) -> List[List[int]])
  • The solution could benefit from early termination in some cases, though this wouldn't improve worst-case complexity

Minor Note:
The comment "TC - O(h)" is slightly misleading - the algorithm visits all nodes, so the actual time complexity is O(n) where n is the number of nodes. The O(h) applies to the space used for the path, not the time complexity.

VERDICT: PASS


Symmetric Tree (symmetrictree.py)

Strengths:

  • Clean, readable implementation that clearly expresses the recursive logic
  • Correctly handles all edge cases (both null, one null, values mismatch)
  • Better space complexity than the iterative reference solution (O(h) vs O(n))
  • Good variable naming and logical flow
  • Proper comment documentation

Areas for Improvement:

  • Could add type hints for better code documentation (e.g., def helper(self, left: Optional[TreeNode], right: Optional[TreeNode]) -> bool)
  • The solution only provides the recursive approach; the follow-up asked for both recursive AND iterative solutions
  • Consider adding a brief docstring explaining the algorithm

Minor suggestions:

  • Could optionally include the iterative approach as well to fully address the follow-up requirement

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants