feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration #381
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a GitHub Actions–style runner: docs, server crate, VM executor (Firecracker + simulated), workflow discovery/execution, webhook handling, LLM/learning wiring, config/role files, end-to-end tests, and infra fixes (rootfs, SSH key selection). Introduces new public executors and server endpoints. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant GitHub
participant Server
participant WorkflowDiscovery
participant LLM
participant VMProvider as FirecrackerAPI
participant VmExecutor
participant KG as KnowledgeGraph
participant GitHubAPI
Note over GitHub,Server: Webhook delivery
GitHub->>Server: POST /webhook + X-Hub-Signature-256
Server->>Server: verify_signature(secret, body)
alt signature valid
Server->>WorkflowDiscovery: discover_workflows_for_event(repo/.github/workflows, event)
WorkflowDiscovery-->>Server: list of workflow paths
opt LLM enabled
Server->>LLM: parse_workflow_yaml_with_llm(workflow)
LLM-->>Server: ParsedWorkflow
end
loop for each workflow
Server->>VMProvider: request VM (create/find)
VMProvider-->>Server: vm_id, vm_type, vm_ip
Server->>VmExecutor: execute(command, session(vm_id), vm_type)
VmExecutor->>VMProvider: POST /execute (fcctl-web)
VMProvider-->>VmExecutor: {exit_code, stdout, stderr}
VmExecutor-->>KG: report outcome (learning coordinator)
end
Server->>GitHubAPI: post_pr_comment(result) (for PRs)
GitHubAPI-->>Server: OK
else signature invalid
Server-->>GitHub: 401
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Code Review: DevOps/CI-CD Role Configuration and GitHub Runner Integration✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR successfully adds comprehensive DevOps/CI-CD role configuration with complete ontology integration for the GitHub runner system. The implementation is well-documented, follows project conventions, and demonstrates operational proof with 49 passing unit tests. 🎯 Strengths1. Excellent Documentation
2. Well-Structured ConfigurationThe
3. Security Best Practices
4. Proven Implementation
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
.docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md (3)
79-90: Consider adding a language specifier to the fenced code block.The architecture diagram code block lacks a language specifier. While this is stylistic, adding an identifier (even empty or
text) improves markdown linting compliance.🔎 Suggested fix
-``` +```text GitHub Webhook → WorkflowContext → ParsedWorkflow → SessionManager
173-173: Bare URL in documentation.Consider wrapping the URL in angle brackets or converting to a markdown link for better accessibility and lint compliance.
🔎 Suggested fix
-- **fcctl-web**: HTTP API for Firecracker (default: http://127.0.0.1:8080) +- **fcctl-web**: HTTP API for Firecracker (default: `http://127.0.0.1:8080`)
252-256: Consider hyphenating compound adjectives."Short Term" and "Long Term" when used as adjectives modifying nouns should be hyphenated: "Short-Term" and "Long-Term".
🔎 Suggested fix
-### Short Term +### Short-Term 1. Dynamic SSH key generation per VM 2. Retry logic with exponential backoff 3. Parallel command execution across multiple VMs 4. VM snapshot/restore for faster startup -### Long Term +### Long-Term.docs/github-runner-ci-integration.md (3)
57-77: Add language specifier to fenced code block.The test results block lacks a language specifier. Consider using
textor leaving empty with proper specifier for markdown lint compliance.🔎 Suggested fix
-``` +```text ✅ Knowledge graph and learning coordinator initialized
86-95: Add language specifier to architecture diagram code block.🔎 Suggested fix
-``` +```text GitHub Webhook → terraphim_github_runner → Firecracker API
212-212: Wrap bare URL in code formatting.🔎 Suggested fix
-- `FIRECRACKER_API_URL`: API base URL (default: http://127.0.0.1:8080) +- `FIRECRACKER_API_URL`: API base URL (default: `http://127.0.0.1:8080`)crates/terraphim_github_runner/FIRECRACKER_FIX.md (1)
24-28: Document the security implications of broad capabilities.The capabilities added (
CAP_SYS_ADMIN,CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE,CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH, etc.) are quite broad. While necessary for Firecracker to function, consider adding a brief note about why these are safe in your deployment context or what compensating controls exist.blog-posts/github-runner-architecture.md (1)
25-36: Add language specifiers to fenced code blocks.Several code blocks lack language specifiers which affects markdown lint compliance:
- Line 25: Architecture diagram
- Line 114: Statistics example
- Line 156: State machine diagram
- Line 172: Example transformation
Consider using
textfor diagrams and plain text output.🔎 Suggested fixes
### High-Level Data Flow -``` +```text GitHub Webhook → WorkflowContext → ParsedWorkflow → SessionManager**Example statistics**: -``` +```text Total successes: 3**State machine**: -``` +```text Created → Executing → Completed/Failed**Example transformation**: -``` +```text Input: "Run cargo test and if it passes, build the project"Also applies to: 114-120, 156-160, 172-180
crates/terraphim_github_runner/SSH_KEY_FIX.md (1)
7-11: Add language specifiers to all fenced code blocks for proper syntax highlighting.Fenced code blocks throughout the file lack language identifiers. Add
bash,rust, orjsonspecifiers after the opening triple backticks to enable correct syntax highlighting and markdown compliance.🔎 Example fixes
Lines 7-11 (error output):
-``` +```bash Warning: Identity file ./images/test-vms/focal/keypair/fctest not accessible: No such file or directory.Lines 16-18 (Rust code):
-```rust +```rust let ssh_key = "./images/test-vms/focal/keypair/fctest";Lines 105-117 (JSON output):
-```json +```json {Also applies to: 16-18, 21-23, 32-40, 44-51, 69-77, 81-100, 105-117, 123-132, 138-147, 154-182
HANDOVER.md (3)
40-40: Specify language for architecture diagram code block.Line 40 contains a fenced code block with ASCII art but lacks a language specifier. Use
```asciior```textto maintain markdown lint compliance.🔎 Proposed fix
-``` +```ascii GitHub Webhook → WorkflowContext → ParsedWorkflow → SessionManager
204-204: Fix typo: "Authenticatio" → "Authentication".Line 204 in the performance metrics section is missing the final "n".
🔎 Proposed fix
-### SSH Authenticatio +### SSH Authentication
232-232: Use heading markup instead of bold emphasis for subsection titles.The troubleshooting section (lines 232–241) uses bold text (
**text**) for subsection titles. Convert these to proper level-3 headings (### text) to comply with markdown standards (MD036) and improve document structure.🔎 Proposed fixes
-**"Permission denied" accessing VM** +### "Permission denied" accessing VM-**"SSH connection refused"** +### "SSH connection refused"-**"User not found in database"** +### "User not found in database"-**"Wrong SSH key for VM type"** +### "Wrong SSH key for VM type"Also applies to: 235-235, 238-238, 241-241
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.docs/github-runner-ci-integration.md.docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md.docs/summary.mdHANDOVER.mdblog-posts/github-runner-architecture.mdcrates/terraphim_github_runner/END_TO_END_PROOF.mdcrates/terraphim_github_runner/FIRECRACKER_FIX.mdcrates/terraphim_github_runner/SSH_KEY_FIX.mdcrates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.mdterraphim_server/default/devops_cicd_config.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md
[uncategorized] ~1-~1: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: # terraphim_github_runner - Summary Last Updated: 202...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...COMPLETE & PROVEN ## Overview The terraphim_github_runner crate provides a complete GitHu...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~153-~153: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ommand Execution - Typical latency: 100-150ms per command - Includes SSH connection o...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[uncategorized] ~252-~252: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...wait?; ``` ## Future Enhancements ### Short Term 1. Dynamic SSH key generation per VM 2....
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
crates/terraphim_github_runner/END_TO_END_PROOF.md
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...rates the end-to-end integration of the terraphim_github_runner crate, proving that: 1. ✅ **Gi...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~139-~139: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...configuration problem, not a bug in the terraphim_github_runner code. Evidence from logs: ...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~175-~175: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...rmissions are fixed ## Conclusion The terraphim_github_runner implementation is **complete an...
(GITHUB)
blog-posts/github-runner-architecture.md
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...orld testing results. ## Overview The terraphim_github_runner crate provides a complete syste...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~335-~335: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...wait?; ``` ## Future Enhancements ### Short Term 1. Dynamic SSH key generation per VM 2....
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~349-~349: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... anomaly detection) ## Conclusion The terraphim_github_runner crate represents a complete int...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~363-~363: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ate Summary**: [.docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md](../.docs/summary-terraphim_g...
(GITHUB)
.docs/summary.md
[uncategorized] ~110-~110: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... GitHub Runner Integration terraphim_github_runner (Complete & Proven): - **Purpo...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~132-~132: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ing boot time) - Command Execution: 100-150ms typical latency - Learning Overhead: <1...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
HANDOVER.md
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...te**: 2025-12-25 Project: terraphim_github_runner Status: ✅ **COMPLETE & PROVE...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... ## What Was Built ### Core Component: terraphim_github_runner Crate Location: `crates/terrap...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~204-~204: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...cho command: 127ms - Directory listing: 115ms - User check: 140ms ### SSH Authenticatio...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[uncategorized] ~215-~215: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | crates/terraphim_github_runner/FIRECRACKER_FIX.md | Rootfs per...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~216-~216: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...KER_FIX.md| Rootfs permission fix | |crates/terraphim_github_runner/SSH_KEY_FIX.md` | SSH key path f...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~217-~217: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: .../SSH_KEY_FIX.md| SSH key path fix | |crates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.md` | Database in...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~218-~218: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ..._INIT.md| Database initialization | |crates/terraphim_github_runner/END_TO_END_PROOF.md` | Integrati...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~246-~246: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...see SSH_KEY_FIX.md) ## Conclusion The terraphim_github_runner crate is production-ready a...
(GITHUB)
.docs/github-runner-ci-integration.md
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...# Overview Successfully integrated the terraphim_github_runner crate with GitHub Actions workf...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~189-~189: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ing boot time) - Command Execution: 100-150ms typical latency - Learning Overhead: <1...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[uncategorized] ~237-~237: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...CD role configuration with ontology | | .docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md | GitHub runner crate refere...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~240-~240: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ecture.md| Architecture blog post | |crates/terraphim_github_runner/FIRECRACKER_FIX.md` | Infrastruc...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~241-~241: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... | Infrastructure fix documentation | | crates/terraphim_github_runner/SSH_KEY_FIX.md | SSH key manage...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~242-~242: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... | SSH key management documentation | | crates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.md | Database in...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~243-~243: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...md| Database initialization guide | |crates/terraphim_github_runner/END_TO_END_PROOF.md` | Integrati...
(GITHUB)
crates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.md
[uncategorized] ~42-~42: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... ### 2. Test Users Created | user_id | github_id | username | subscription_tier | |--...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~213-~213: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... fcctl-web configuration bug, not a terraphim_github_runner code issue. --- *User initial...
(GITHUB)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
.docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md
79-79: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
173-173: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
blog-posts/github-runner-architecture.md
25-25: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
114-114: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
156-156: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
172-172: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
372-372: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
crates/terraphim_github_runner/SSH_KEY_FIX.md
75-75: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
119-119: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
142-142: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
HANDOVER.md
40-40: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
232-232: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
235-235: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
238-238: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
241-241: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
.docs/github-runner-ci-integration.md
57-57: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
86-86: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
212-212: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
crates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.md
6-6: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.docs/github-runner-ci-integration.md (1)
1-258: LGTM - Comprehensive integration documentation.The document provides excellent coverage of the GitHub Runner CI/CD integration, including role configurations, workflow examples, architecture diagrams, and usage instructions. The structure is clear and the cross-references to related documentation files are helpful.
terraphim_server/default/devops_cicd_config.json (1)
1-223: Role configuration structure looks well-designed.The three-role structure (Default, DevOps Engineer, GitHub Runner Specialist) with differentiated knowledge graphs, haystacks, and LLM configurations is well thought out. The extra metadata fields (specialization, core_modules, performance_metrics) provide useful context for the roles.
.docs/summary.md (1)
108-147: LGTM - Well-integrated GitHub Runner section.The new section provides a concise summary of the
terraphim_github_runnercapabilities, core modules with LOC counts, performance metrics, and configuration options. It integrates well with the existing document structure and provides appropriate cross-references to detailed documentation.crates/terraphim_github_runner/END_TO_END_PROOF.md (1)
1-195: LGTM - Excellent end-to-end proof documentation.This document clearly demonstrates the integration works by providing:
- Code snippets showing actual implementation
- API response evidence
- Test results for knowledge graph components
- Honest distinction between code issues and infrastructure issues
The structured approach (What Was Proven → Infrastructure Issues → Conclusion) makes it easy to understand the current state.
blog-posts/github-runner-architecture.md (1)
1-372: LGTM - Well-crafted architecture article.This blog post provides an excellent technical deep-dive into the GitHub runner architecture. The progression from high-level overview to component details, integration challenges, and usage examples is well-structured. The inclusion of actual performance metrics and test results adds credibility.
crates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.md (2)
1-219: LGTM - Useful troubleshooting documentation.This document provides clear step-by-step documentation of the test user initialization process, including the problem, root cause, solution, and verification steps. The API response examples make it easy to verify correct behavior.
219-219: Missing closing backtick in code reference.The script path reference is missing its closing backtick.
🔎 Suggested fix
-*Script: `/tmp/create_test_users.py` +*Script: `/tmp/create_test_users.py`*Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| ### Optional Environment Variables | ||
| - `FIRECRACKER_VM_TYPE`: Default VM type (default: `bionic-test`) | ||
| - `RUST_LOG`: Logging verbosity (default: `info`) | ||
| - `OPENRouter_API_KEY`: For LLM-based workflow parsing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Environment variable name has inconsistent casing.
The environment variable OPENRouter_API_KEY appears to have a typo in its casing. Standard convention would be OPENROUTER_API_KEY (all uppercase with underscores).
🔎 Suggested fix
-- `OPENRouter_API_KEY`: For LLM-based workflow parsing
+- `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`: For LLM-based workflow parsing📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - `OPENRouter_API_KEY`: For LLM-based workflow parsing | |
| - `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`: For LLM-based workflow parsing |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .docs/summary-terraphim_github_runner.md at line 116, the environment
variable name uses inconsistent casing `OPENRouter_API_KEY`; change it to the
correct conventional uppercase underscore form `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` (update the
markdown text and any surrounding references on this line to use the corrected
name).
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| *Proof generated: 2024-12-24* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Date inconsistency with PR timeline.
Same issue as FIRECRACKER_FIX.md - the date shows "2024-12-24" but should likely be "2025-12-24".
🔎 Suggested fix
-*Proof generated: 2024-12-24*
+*Proof generated: 2025-12-24*📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| *Proof generated: 2024-12-24* | |
| *Proof generated: 2025-12-24* |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In crates/terraphim_github_runner/END_TO_END_PROOF.md around line 194, the
generated proof date is incorrectly set to "2024-12-24"; update the date string
to "2025-12-24" to match the PR timeline and other docs, saving the file after
replacing the single occurrence.
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| *Fixed: 2024-12-24* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Date appears inconsistent with PR timeline.
The fix date shows "2024-12-24" but the PR is from 2025-12-25. This may be a typo.
🔎 Suggested fix
-*Fixed: 2024-12-24*
+*Fixed: 2025-12-24*📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| *Fixed: 2024-12-24* | |
| *Fixed: 2025-12-24* |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In crates/terraphim_github_runner/FIRECRACKER_FIX.md around line 85, the fix
date is listed as "2024-12-24" which conflicts with the PR date; update that
line to the correct date "2025-12-25" (or the intended date consistent with the
PR timeline) and save the file so the changelog entry matches the PR.
| test_users = [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "testuser", | ||
| "github_id": 123456789, | ||
| "username": "testuser", | ||
| "email": "test@example.com", | ||
| "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789", | ||
| "subscription_tier": "demo", | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "test_user_123", | ||
| "github_id": 123456789, | ||
| "username": "testuser", | ||
| "email": "test@example.com", | ||
| "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789", | ||
| "subscription_tier": "demo", | ||
| }, | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate github_id for different users may cause database issues.
Both test users (testuser and test_user_123) have the same github_id: 123456789, but the schema shows github_id INTEGER UNIQUE NOT NULL. This would cause a unique constraint violation when inserting the second user.
🔎 Suggested fix
test_users = [
{
"id": "testuser",
"github_id": 123456789,
"username": "testuser",
"email": "test@example.com",
"avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789",
"subscription_tier": "demo",
},
{
"id": "test_user_123",
- "github_id": 123456789,
+ "github_id": 123456790,
"username": "testuser",
"email": "test@example.com",
- "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789",
+ "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456790",
"subscription_tier": "demo",
},
]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test_users = [ | |
| { | |
| "id": "testuser", | |
| "github_id": 123456789, | |
| "username": "testuser", | |
| "email": "test@example.com", | |
| "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789", | |
| "subscription_tier": "demo", | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": "test_user_123", | |
| "github_id": 123456789, | |
| "username": "testuser", | |
| "email": "test@example.com", | |
| "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789", | |
| "subscription_tier": "demo", | |
| }, | |
| ] | |
| test_users = [ | |
| { | |
| "id": "testuser", | |
| "github_id": 123456789, | |
| "username": "testuser", | |
| "email": "test@example.com", | |
| "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456789", | |
| "subscription_tier": "demo", | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "id": "test_user_123", | |
| "github_id": 123456790, | |
| "username": "testuser", | |
| "email": "test@example.com", | |
| "avatar_url": "https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/123456790", | |
| "subscription_tier": "demo", | |
| }, | |
| ] |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In crates/terraphim_github_runner/TEST_USER_INIT.md around lines 56 to 73, two
test users share the same github_id (123456789) which violates the schema
constraint github_id INTEGER UNIQUE NOT NULL; change one of the users to a
different unique integer github_id (e.g., 123456790) so each test user has a
distinct github_id and the insertion won't fail due to unique constraint
violations.
| { | ||
| "location": "/home/alex/projects/terraphim/firecracker-rust/fcctl-web", | ||
| "service": "Ripgrep", | ||
| "read_only": true, | ||
| "atomic_server_secret": null, | ||
| "extra_parameters": {} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded absolute path will break portability.
The haystack location /home/alex/projects/terraphim/firecracker-rust/fcctl-web is an absolute path specific to one developer's machine. This will fail for other contributors or in CI/CD environments.
Consider using a relative path, environment variable, or removing this haystack if it references an external project.
🔎 Suggested fix options
Option 1: Remove if external project
- {
- "location": "/home/alex/projects/terraphim/firecracker-rust/fcctl-web",
- "service": "Ripgrep",
- "read_only": true,
- "atomic_server_secret": null,
- "extra_parameters": {}
- }Option 2: Use environment variable placeholder (if supported)
- "location": "/home/alex/projects/terraphim/firecracker-rust/fcctl-web",
+ "location": "${FCCTL_WEB_PATH:-./external/fcctl-web}",🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In terraphim_server/default/devops_cicd_config.json around lines 176 to 182, the
"location" field contains a hardcoded absolute path (/home/alex/...), which
breaks portability; replace it with a portable solution: either remove the entry
if it points to an external project, or change "location" to a relative path
from the repo root (e.g., "./firecracker-rust/fcctl-web") or reference an
environment variable placeholder (e.g., "${FCCTL_WEB_PATH}") and update CI/dev
docs to set that variable; ensure read_only and other keys remain unchanged.
Code Review: DevOps/CI-CD Role Configuration and GitHub Runner IntegrationSummaryThis PR adds comprehensive DevOps/CI-CD role configuration with GitHub runner integration, including role ontology and workflow execution capabilities. Overall, this is a well-structured addition with good test coverage. However, there are several important security, error handling, and code quality concerns that should be addressed. 🔴 Critical Issues1. Security: Error Handling Reveals Sensitive InformationLocation: let error_msg = body["error"]
.as_str()
.unwrap_or("Unknown error")
.to_string();Issue: Error messages from the API are directly returned to callers without sanitization. This could leak sensitive information like internal paths, API tokens, or system details. Recommendation: Sanitize error messages and log full details securely: let error_msg = body["error"].as_str().unwrap_or("Unknown error");
warn\!("Command execution failed: {}", error_msg);
// Return sanitized error
Ok(CommandResult {
exit_code: 1,
stdout: String::new(),
stderr: "Command execution failed".to_string(),
duration,
})2. Security: Timing Attack Vulnerability in Signature VerificationLocation: Ok(hex_signature == signature)Issue: Using Recommendation: Use constant-time comparison: use subtle::ConstantTimeEq;
Ok(hex_signature.as_bytes().ct_eq(signature.as_bytes()).into())Add 3. Security: Missing Authentication Token ValidationLocation: let auth_token = std::env::var("FIRECRACKER_AUTH_TOKEN").ok();Issue: The auth token is read from environment but never validated for format or length. Empty or malformed tokens could cause issues. Recommendation: Validate the token: let auth_token = std::env::var("FIRECRACKER_AUTH_TOKEN")
.ok()
.filter(|t| \!t.is_empty() && t.len() >= 32);
if auth_token.is_none() {
warn\!("FIRECRACKER_AUTH_TOKEN not set or invalid");
}🟡 High Priority Issues4. Error Handling: Excessive use of
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/Cargo.toml (1)
8-52: Runcargo auditagainst Cargo.lock to verify transitive dependencies are free from known vulnerabilities.The specified versions appear sound:
jsonwebtokenis on version 9 (the fixed series addressing prior Auth0/Okta vulnerabilities), and no public RustSec advisories were found forsalvo 0.74.3,octocrab 0.42.1,hmac 0.12, orsha2 0.10. However, transitive dependencies fromreqwest 0.12may have advisories; runcargo auditto ensure your complete dependency tree is clean.docs/github-runner-setup.md (1)
523-525: Format bare URLs as proper Markdown links.The support section contains bare URLs that should be formatted as proper Markdown links for better readability and maintainability.
🔎 Proposed fix
## Support -- **Issues**: https://github.com/terraphim/terraphim-ai/issues -- **Docs**: https://github.com/terraphim/terraphim-ai/tree/main/docs +- **Issues**: [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/terraphim/terraphim-ai/issues) +- **Docs**: [Documentation](https://github.com/terraphim/terraphim-ai/tree/main/docs) - **Discord**: [Join our Discord](https://discord.gg/terraphim)docs/github-runner-architecture.md (1)
537-549: Use proper Markdown headings instead of bold text.The troubleshooting section uses bold text for subsections. These should be formatted as proper Markdown headings (e.g.,
####) for better document structure, navigation, and accessibility.🔎 Proposed fix
### Common Issues -**1. "Invalid webhook signature"** +#### 1. "Invalid webhook signature" + - Check `GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET` matches GitHub repo settings - Verify signature calculation includes full body -**2. "Model not found" (Ollama)** +#### 2. "Model not found" (Ollama) + - Pull model: `ollama pull gemma3:4b` - Check `OLLAMA_BASE_URL` is correct -**3. "Firecracker API unreachable"** +#### 3. "Firecracker API unreachable" + - Verify Firecracker is running: `curl http://127.0.0.1:8080/health` - Check `FIRECRACKER_API_URL` configuration -**4. "VM allocation failed"** +#### 4. "VM allocation failed" + - Check Firecracker resources (CPU, memory) - Verify JWT token if auth enabledcrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/execution.rs (2)
265-268: Consider integrating the LearningCoordinator into workflow execution.The
LearningCoordinatoris created but never used (note the_prefix). According to the PR objectives and architecture documentation, the learning coordinator should track execution patterns to optimize future runs.Consider passing the learning coordinator to the
WorkflowExecutoror manually recording execution results to enable pattern learning. For example:🔎 Proposed integration
// Create learning coordinator info!("🧠 Initializing LearningCoordinator for pattern tracking"); - let _learning_coordinator: Arc<dyn LearningCoordinator> = + let learning_coordinator: Arc<dyn LearningCoordinator> = Arc::new(InMemoryLearningCoordinator::new("github-runner")); // ... (create session manager and workflow executor) // Execute workflow info!("Starting workflow execution: {}", workflow.name); let result = workflow_executor .execute_workflow(&workflow, &context) .await; + // Record execution for learning + if let Ok(ref workflow_result) = result { + for step in &workflow_result.steps { + let _ = learning_coordinator.record_command_execution( + &step.command, + matches!(step.status, ExecutionStatus::Success), + step.duration_ms, + ).await; + } + }Alternatively, if learning integration is deferred, add a TODO comment explaining when and how it will be integrated.
87-223: Consider simplifying the YAML parsing logic.The
parse_workflow_yaml_simplefunction implements manual YAML parsing with complex state tracking (lines 99-205). This logic is fragile and may miss edge cases in GitHub Actions syntax.Consider using a proper YAML parsing library like
serde_yamlto parse the workflow structure, then extract the relevant fields. This would be more maintainable and handle edge cases better.🔎 Alternative approach using serde_yaml
use serde_yaml::Value; use std::collections::HashMap; pub fn parse_workflow_yaml_simple(workflow_path: &Path) -> Result<ParsedWorkflow> { let workflow_yaml = fs::read_to_string(workflow_path)?; let workflow_name = workflow_path .file_name() .and_then(|n| n.to_str()) .unwrap_or("unknown") .to_string(); let yaml: Value = serde_yaml::from_str(&workflow_yaml)?; let mut steps = vec![]; if let Some(jobs) = yaml.get("jobs").and_then(|j| j.as_mapping()) { for (_, job) in jobs { if let Some(job_steps) = job.get("steps").and_then(|s| s.as_sequence()) { for step in job_steps { let name = step.get("name") .and_then(|n| n.as_str()) .unwrap_or("Unnamed step"); let command = step.get("run") .and_then(|r| r.as_str()) .unwrap_or(""); if !command.is_empty() { steps.push(WorkflowStep { name: name.to_string(), command: command.to_string(), working_dir: "/workspace".to_string(), continue_on_error: false, timeout_seconds: 300, }); } } } } } Ok(ParsedWorkflow { name: workflow_name, trigger: "webhook".to_string(), environment: HashMap::new(), setup_commands: vec![ "echo 'Starting workflow execution'".to_string(), "cd /workspace || mkdir -p /workspace".to_string(), ], steps, cleanup_commands: vec!["echo 'Workflow execution complete'".to_string()], cache_paths: vec![], }) }Note: This would require adding
serde_yamlas a dependency if not already present.crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/signature.rs (1)
30-45: Use#[tokio::test]instead of creating runtime manually.The tests create a new
tokio::runtime::Runtimeper test, but#[tokio::test]is already available and cleaner. This is especially relevant ifverify_signaturebecomes synchronous.🔎 Proposed refactor for tests
- #[test] - fn test_verify_signature_valid() { + #[tokio::test] + async fn test_verify_signature_valid() { let secret = "test_secret"; let body = b"test payload"; // Generate valid signature let mut mac = Hmac::<Sha256>::new_from_slice(secret.as_bytes()).unwrap(); mac.update(body); let signature = format!("sha256={}", hex::encode(mac.finalize().into_bytes())); - let result = tokio::runtime::Runtime::new() - .unwrap() - .block_on(verify_signature(secret, &signature, body)); + let result = verify_signature(secret, &signature, body).await; assert!(result.unwrap()); }crates/terraphim_github_runner/tests/end_to_end_test.rs (3)
99-168: Reduce code duplication in VM discovery/creation logic.The VM creation logic is duplicated between lines 118-140 and 142-164. Consider extracting a helper function.
🔎 Proposed helper function
async fn get_or_create_vm(client: &reqwest::Client, jwt_token: &str) -> String { let list_response = client .get("http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/vms") .bearer_auth(jwt_token) .send() .await .expect("Failed to list VMs"); let vms: serde_json::Value = list_response.json().await.expect("Failed to parse VM list"); if let Some(vms_array) = vms["vms"].as_array() { if let Some(vm) = vms_array.iter().find(|v| v["status"] == "running") { println!("✅ Using existing VM: {}", vm["id"]); return vm["id"].as_str().unwrap().to_string(); } } // Create new VM println!("Creating new VM..."); let create_response = client .post("http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/vms") .bearer_auth(jwt_token) .json(&serde_json::json!({"name": "test-runner", "vm_type": "bionic-test"})) .send() .await .expect("Failed to create VM"); let new_vm: serde_json::Value = create_response .json() .await .expect("Failed to parse create VM response"); let vm_id = new_vm["id"].as_str().unwrap().to_string(); println!("✅ Created new VM: {}", vm_id); // Wait for VM to boot println!("⏳ Waiting 10 seconds for VM to boot..."); tokio::time::sleep(tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(10)).await; vm_id }
275-305: Consider logging learning coordinator errors instead of silently ignoring them.The
let _ = coordinator.record_success(...)andlet _ = coordinator.record_failure(...)patterns silently discard errors. While this may be intentional for the test, it could mask issues with the learning coordinator.🔎 Proposed fix to log errors
- // Record success in learning coordinator - let _ = coordinator - .record_success(&step.command, result.duration.as_millis() as u64, &context) - .await; + // Record success in learning coordinator + if let Err(e) = coordinator + .record_success(&step.command, result.duration.as_millis() as u64, &context) + .await + { + println!(" ⚠️ Failed to record success: {}", e); + }
360-367: Themain()function doesn't run tests.This
main()function only prints instructions and doesn't actually execute any tests. This is unusual for a test file - consider either removing it or documenting its purpose more clearly.crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/config/mod.rs (1)
43-57: Silent fallback on PORT parse error may hide misconfiguration.If
PORTcontains an invalid value like"abc", the code silently falls back to3000. Consider logging a warning or returning an error for invalid port values.Also,
firecracker_auth_tokendefaults to an empty string, but the code inmain.rs(line 146-150) treats empty string as "no token". Consider usingOption<String>for consistency withgithub_token.🔎 Proposed improvement for PORT validation
Ok(Settings { port: env::var("PORT") .ok() - .and_then(|p| p.parse().ok()) + .and_then(|p| { + p.parse().map_err(|e| { + eprintln!("Warning: Invalid PORT '{}': {}, using default 3000", p, e); + e + }).ok() + }) .unwrap_or(3000),crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/discovery.rs (1)
83-161: Simple YAML parsing has known limitations that may cause false positives/negatives.The comment on line 84-85 acknowledges this, but some specific issues:
- Line 119:
trimmed.starts_with("push:")could matchpush_to_deploy:or similar keys.- Lines 127-139: Only handles inline array format
[main, develop], not multi-line YAML arrays.- Line 114:
trimmed.contains("pull_request")matches anywhere, including in comments.For production use, consider using
serde_yamlto properly parse theon:section.🔎 Proposed more robust push detection
- // Check for push trigger - if trimmed.starts_with("push:") || trimmed.starts_with("push ") { + // Check for push trigger (ensure exact match, not prefix of another key) + if trimmed == "push:" || trimmed == "push" || trimmed.starts_with("push:") && !trimmed.contains("_") { has_push = true; in_push_section = true; }Consider tracking this as technical debt for a proper YAML parser integration.
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/main.rs (3)
164-172: Settings are reloaded on every webhook request.
Settings::from_env()is called for each incoming request (line 166), which re-reads environment variables and allocates new strings. Consider loading settings once at startup and sharing viaArcor Salvo'sDepot.🔎 Proposed approach using Arc
// In main(): let settings = Arc::new(Settings::from_env()?); let router = Router::new() .hoop(affix_state::inject(settings)) .push(Router::with_path("webhook").post(handle_webhook)); // In handler: #[handler] async fn handle_webhook(req: &mut Request, depot: &mut Depot, res: &mut Response) -> Result<(), StatusError> { let settings = depot.obtain::<Arc<Settings>>().unwrap(); // ... }
131-139: Castingi64tou64for PR number could wrap on negative values.Line 135 casts
webhook.number(i64) directly tou64. While GitHub PR numbers are always positive, defensive coding would validate this.🔎 Proposed validation
- number: webhook.number as u64, + number: webhook.number.try_into().unwrap_or(0),
243-276: Background tasks silently continue on errors.The spawned task logs errors but the caller has no way to know if workflow execution failed. For observability, consider emitting metrics or using a result channel.
crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs (2)
32-47: HTTP client creation usesexpect()which panics on failure.While
reqwest::Client::builder().build()is unlikely to fail, usingexpect()in a library function can cause unexpected panics. Consider returning aResultfrom constructors.🔎 Proposed fallible constructor
impl VmCommandExecutor { pub fn new(api_base_url: impl Into<String>) -> Result<Self> { let client = reqwest::Client::builder() .timeout(Duration::from_secs(300)) .build() .map_err(|e| GitHubRunnerError::ConfigError(format!("Failed to create HTTP client: {}", e)))?; let auth_token = std::env::var("FIRECRACKER_AUTH_TOKEN").ok(); Ok(Self { api_base_url: api_base_url.into(), client, snapshot_counter: AtomicU64::new(0), auth_token, }) } }
291-295: Mutex lock usesunwrap()which panics on poisoned mutex.
self.execution_log.lock().unwrap()will panic if another thread panicked while holding the lock. In a testing utility, this is acceptable, but consider documenting this behavior.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
.github/workflows/test-ci.ymlcrates/terraphim_github_runner/Cargo.tomlcrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/lib.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/mod.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner/tests/end_to_end_test.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/Cargo.tomlcrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/README.mdcrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/config/mod.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/github/mod.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/main.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/mod.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/signature.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/discovery.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/execution.rscrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/mod.rsdocs/github-runner-architecture.mddocs/github-runner-setup.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (5)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/mod.rs (2)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/discovery.rs (1)
discover_workflows_for_event(15-72)crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/execution.rs (1)
execute_workflows_in_vms(353-401)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/mod.rs (1)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/signature.rs (1)
verify_signature(16-24)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/main.rs (7)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/github/mod.rs (1)
post_pr_comment(15-41)crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/signature.rs (1)
verify_signature(16-24)crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/discovery.rs (1)
discover_workflows_for_event(15-72)crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/execution.rs (1)
execute_workflows_in_vms(353-401)crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/config/mod.rs (1)
from_env(38-58)crates/terraphim_service/src/llm.rs (1)
build_llm_from_role(56-136)crates/terraphim_github_runner/tests/end_to_end_test.rs (1)
main(361-367)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/execution.rs (4)
crates/terraphim_agent/src/robot/output.rs (1)
format(185-195)crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs (4)
new(32-47)new(274-281)with_auth(50-62)default(268-270)crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/executor.rs (2)
session_manager(470-472)with_executor(182-192)crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/session/manager.rs (1)
with_provider(131-138)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/config/mod.rs (1)
crates/terraphim_config/examples/atomic_server_config.rs (1)
std(399-401)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/github-runner-architecture.md
[uncategorized] ~83-~83: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...``` ## Components ### 1. HTTP Server (terraphim_github_runner_server) Framework: Salvo (...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~121-~121: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ws] ``` Discovery Process: 1. Scan .github/workflows/ directory 2. Parse YAML fro...
(GITHUB)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/README.md
[uncategorized] ~74-~74: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...`` ### 2. Create Workflow File Create .github/workflows/test.yml: ```yaml name: Tes...
(GITHUB)
docs/github-runner-setup.md
[uncategorized] ~133-~133: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...`` ### 3. Create Test Workflow Create .github/workflows/test.yml: ```yaml name: Ter...
(GITHUB)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/github-runner-architecture.md
12-12: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
13-13: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
150-150: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
537-537: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
541-541: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
545-545: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
549-549: Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
596-596: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/README.md
316-316: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
docs/github-runner-setup.md
523-523: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
524-524: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
🔇 Additional comments (12)
crates/terraphim_github_runner/Cargo.toml (2)
53-53: No action needed. The env_logger dependency "0.11" resolves to the latest version in the 0.11 series (0.11.8), which is current.
32-33: The reqwest dependency configuration is appropriate for the intended use case. Analysis of the codebase shows that reqwest is used exclusively for local HTTP API calls to the Firecracker VM control endpoint (e.g.,http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/vms), as seen insrc/workflow/vm_executor.rsand test files. No HTTPS connections are made via this HTTP client. While the codebase contains GitHub repository URLs, they are not accessed through reqwest and therefore do not require TLS features. The version 0.12 is stable with no direct security advisories.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
.github/workflows/test-ci.yml (1)
13-25: Verify this is intentionally a mock workflow.This workflow only prints messages without performing actual checkout, test execution, or build operations. If this is a test/demo workflow for validating the GitHub runner integration, consider adding a comment in the file explaining its purpose to prevent confusion.
If this is meant to be a functional CI workflow, the steps should be updated to:
- Use
actions/checkout@v4for code checkout- Execute actual test commands (e.g.,
cargo test)- Execute actual build commands (e.g.,
cargo build)🔎 Example of a functional workflow
steps: - name: Checkout code - run: echo "Checking out code..." + uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Run tests run: | - echo "Running tests..." - echo "✓ Test 1 passed" - echo "✓ Test 2 passed" + cargo test --verbose - name: Build project run: | - echo "Building project..." - echo "Build complete!" + cargo build --releasecrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/mod.rs (1)
1-3: LGTM!Clean module structure with appropriate re-export of the signature verification functionality.
crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/lib.rs (1)
64-67: LGTM! VM executor exports added correctly.The new exports
SimulatedVmExecutorandVmCommandExecutorproperly extend the public API to support Firecracker-based VM execution, aligning with the PR's objectives.crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/README.md (1)
1-375: Excellent comprehensive documentation!This README provides thorough coverage of features, setup, configuration, troubleshooting, and deployment options. The included code examples, environment variables table, and testing instructions make it easy for users to get started with the GitHub Runner Server.
crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/mod.rs (1)
6-16: LGTM! VM executor module integrated properly.The addition of the
vm_executormodule and its public exports (SimulatedVmExecutorandVmCommandExecutor) cleanly extends the workflow module to support Firecracker-based execution.crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/github/mod.rs (1)
1-41: LGTM!Clean implementation of PR comment posting with appropriate error handling. The graceful fallback when
GITHUB_TOKENis unset allows the server to operate in environments where PR commenting isn't needed.crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/mod.rs (1)
1-5: LGTM!Clean module organization with appropriate public re-exports for the workflow discovery and execution API surface.
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/workflow/discovery.rs (1)
163-220: Good test coverage for the YAML parsing logic.The tests cover the main scenarios (pull_request, push with branches, no matching trigger). Consider adding edge case tests for the parsing limitations mentioned above.
crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/main.rs (1)
431-461: Tests useunsafefor environment variable manipulation.The
unsafe { std::env::set_var(...) }blocks are acceptable for test isolation, but note that concurrent tests modifying environment variables could interfere with each other. Consider using#[serial_test::serial]if flakiness occurs.crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs (1)
375-461: Good test coverage for the SimulatedVmExecutor.Tests cover success, failure, snapshot creation, and rollback scenarios. Well structured.
| [package] | ||
| name = "terraphim_github_runner_server" | ||
| version = "0.1.0" | ||
| edition = "2024" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Invalid Rust edition - compilation will fail.
Rust edition "2024" does not exist. Valid editions are 2015, 2018, and 2021. This will cause immediate compilation failure.
🔎 Proposed fix
-edition = "2024"
+edition = "2021"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| edition = "2024" | |
| edition = "2021" |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/Cargo.toml at line 4 the edition is set
to "2024", which is invalid and will break compilation; change the edition field
to a valid Rust edition (e.g., "2021") in this Cargo.toml (and any workspace
member Cargo.toml files if present) and then run cargo check/build to verify the
project compiles.
| pub async fn verify_signature(secret: &str, signature: &str, body: &[u8]) -> Result<bool> { | ||
| let signature = signature.replace("sha256=", ""); | ||
| let mut mac = Hmac::<Sha256>::new_from_slice(secret.as_bytes())?; | ||
| mac.update(body); | ||
| let result = mac.finalize().into_bytes(); | ||
| let hex_signature = hex::encode(result); | ||
|
|
||
| Ok(hex_signature == signature) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
subtle crate rust constant time comparison ConstantTimeEq
💡 Result:
The subtle crate provides constant-time primitives for Rust crypto. Its ConstantTimeEq trait exposes:
- fn ct_eq(&self, other: &Self) -> Choice — returns Choice(1) if equal, Choice(0) if not; intended to run in constant time. [1][2]
- A default ct_ne was added in v2.5.0. [3]
Example:
use subtle::ConstantTimeEq;
let a: [u8; 3] = [1,2,3];
let b: [u8; 3] = [1,2,4];
assert_eq!(a.ct_eq(&b).unwrap_u8(), 0);
assert_eq!(a.ct_eq(&a).unwrap_u8(), 1);
Notes: subtle is a “best-effort” library — constant-timeness depends on CPU, compiler optimizations, and how bitwise ops are lowered/optimized; use with care. [1]
Sources:
[1] subtle crate docs (overview).
[2] ConstantTimeEq trait docs (ct_eq).
[3] subtle CHANGELOG (ct_ne added in 2.5.0).
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if subtle is a dependency in the project
find . -name "Cargo.toml" -type f | head -20 | xargs grep -l "subtle" 2>/dev/null || echo "No Cargo.toml files found with subtle dependency"
# Find and inspect the signature.rs file
find . -path "*/webhook/signature.rs" -type fRepository: terraphim/terraphim-ai
Length of output: 179
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Read the signature.rs file to verify current state
cat -n ./crates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/webhook/signature.rs | head -50Repository: terraphim/terraphim-ai
Length of output: 1953
Use constant-time comparison for HMAC signature verification.
The current == comparison on line 23 is vulnerable to timing attacks. HMAC verification is a security-sensitive operation where constant-time comparison is a best practice. Use the subtle crate (which will need to be added to dependencies) with its ConstantTimeEq trait to mitigate this risk.
Additionally, the function is marked async but contains no .await points—consider removing the async marker to make it synchronous.
use anyhow::Result;
use hmac::{Hmac, Mac};
use sha2::Sha256;
+use subtle::ConstantTimeEq;
-pub async fn verify_signature(secret: &str, signature: &str, body: &[u8]) -> Result<bool> {
+pub fn verify_signature(secret: &str, signature: &str, body: &[u8]) -> Result<bool> {
let signature = signature.replace("sha256=", "");
let mut mac = Hmac::<Sha256>::new_from_slice(secret.as_bytes())?;
mac.update(body);
let result = mac.finalize().into_bytes();
let hex_signature = hex::encode(result);
+ let expected_bytes = hex_signature.as_bytes();
+ let provided_bytes = signature.as_bytes();
- Ok(hex_signature == signature)
+ Ok(expected_bytes.len() == provided_bytes.len()
+ && expected_bytes.ct_eq(provided_bytes).into())
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| struct FirecrackerVmProvider { | ||
| _api_base_url: String, | ||
| _auth_token: Option<String>, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[async_trait::async_trait] | ||
| impl VmProvider for FirecrackerVmProvider { | ||
| async fn allocate(&self, _vm_type: &str) -> RunnerResult<(String, Duration)> { | ||
| // This is a placeholder - in real implementation, we'd call the Firecracker API | ||
| // For now, return a mock VM ID | ||
| Ok(( | ||
| format!("fc-vm-{}", uuid::Uuid::new_v4()), | ||
| Duration::from_millis(100), | ||
| )) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async fn release(&self, _vm_id: &str) -> RunnerResult<()> { | ||
| Ok(()) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implement the Firecracker VM allocation logic.
The FirecrackerVmProvider is a placeholder that generates mock VM IDs without actually allocating Firecracker VMs via the API. This means workflows won't execute in isolated VMs as intended.
The allocate method should call the Firecracker API (using the _api_base_url and _auth_token fields) to create a real VM. Currently, it returns:
- A fake UUID that doesn't correspond to any actual VM
- A hardcoded 100ms duration
This will cause the VmCommandExecutor to fail when it attempts to execute commands, as the VM ID won't exist in the Firecracker infrastructure.
Would you like me to generate a proper implementation that calls the Firecracker API to allocate VMs, or is this intentionally a stub for testing purposes? If the latter, consider adding a #[cfg(test)] attribute or renaming to MockFirecrackerVmProvider to make the intent clearer.
| async fn create_snapshot(&self, session: &Session, name: &str) -> Result<SnapshotId> { | ||
| info!("Creating snapshot '{}' for VM {}", name, session.vm_id); | ||
|
|
||
| let payload = serde_json::json!({ | ||
| "name": name, | ||
| "description": format!("Snapshot after step: {}", name), | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| let response = self | ||
| .client | ||
| .post(self.snapshot_url(&session.vm_id)) | ||
| .json(&payload) | ||
| .send() | ||
| .await | ||
| .map_err(|e| { | ||
| GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!("Snapshot request failed: {}", e)) | ||
| })?; | ||
|
|
||
| if response.status().is_success() { | ||
| let body: serde_json::Value = response.json().await.map_err(|e| { | ||
| GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!( | ||
| "Failed to parse snapshot response: {}", | ||
| e | ||
| )) | ||
| })?; | ||
|
|
||
| let snapshot_id = body["snapshot_id"] | ||
| .as_str() | ||
| .map(|s| s.to_string()) | ||
| .unwrap_or_else(|| { | ||
| format!( | ||
| "snapshot-{}", | ||
| self.snapshot_counter.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst) | ||
| ) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| info!("Created snapshot: {}", snapshot_id); | ||
| Ok(SnapshotId(snapshot_id)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Err(GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!( | ||
| "Snapshot creation failed with status: {}", | ||
| response.status() | ||
| ))) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Snapshot operations don't include auth token.
The execute method (line 112-114) includes the auth token via Bearer header, but create_snapshot (lines 176-184) and rollback (lines 220-228) don't add authentication. If the Firecracker API requires auth for all operations, this will cause failures.
🔎 Proposed fix to add auth to snapshot operations
- let response = self
- .client
+ let mut request = self
+ .client
.post(self.snapshot_url(&session.vm_id))
- .json(&payload)
- .send()
+ .json(&payload);
+
+ if let Some(ref token) = self.auth_token {
+ request = request.header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {}", token));
+ }
+
+ let response = request.send()
.await
.map_err(|e| {
GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!("Snapshot request failed: {}", e))
})?;Apply similar fix to rollback method.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async fn create_snapshot(&self, session: &Session, name: &str) -> Result<SnapshotId> { | |
| info!("Creating snapshot '{}' for VM {}", name, session.vm_id); | |
| let payload = serde_json::json!({ | |
| "name": name, | |
| "description": format!("Snapshot after step: {}", name), | |
| }); | |
| let response = self | |
| .client | |
| .post(self.snapshot_url(&session.vm_id)) | |
| .json(&payload) | |
| .send() | |
| .await | |
| .map_err(|e| { | |
| GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!("Snapshot request failed: {}", e)) | |
| })?; | |
| if response.status().is_success() { | |
| let body: serde_json::Value = response.json().await.map_err(|e| { | |
| GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!( | |
| "Failed to parse snapshot response: {}", | |
| e | |
| )) | |
| })?; | |
| let snapshot_id = body["snapshot_id"] | |
| .as_str() | |
| .map(|s| s.to_string()) | |
| .unwrap_or_else(|| { | |
| format!( | |
| "snapshot-{}", | |
| self.snapshot_counter.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst) | |
| ) | |
| }); | |
| info!("Created snapshot: {}", snapshot_id); | |
| Ok(SnapshotId(snapshot_id)) | |
| } else { | |
| Err(GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!( | |
| "Snapshot creation failed with status: {}", | |
| response.status() | |
| ))) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async fn create_snapshot(&self, session: &Session, name: &str) -> Result<SnapshotId> { | |
| info!("Creating snapshot '{}' for VM {}", name, session.vm_id); | |
| let payload = serde_json::json!({ | |
| "name": name, | |
| "description": format!("Snapshot after step: {}", name), | |
| }); | |
| let mut request = self | |
| .client | |
| .post(self.snapshot_url(&session.vm_id)) | |
| .json(&payload); | |
| if let Some(ref token) = self.auth_token { | |
| request = request.header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {}", token)); | |
| } | |
| let response = request.send() | |
| .await | |
| .map_err(|e| { | |
| GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!("Snapshot request failed: {}", e)) | |
| })?; | |
| if response.status().is_success() { | |
| let body: serde_json::Value = response.json().await.map_err(|e| { | |
| GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!( | |
| "Failed to parse snapshot response: {}", | |
| e | |
| )) | |
| })?; | |
| let snapshot_id = body["snapshot_id"] | |
| .as_str() | |
| .map(|s| s.to_string()) | |
| .unwrap_or_else(|| { | |
| format!( | |
| "snapshot-{}", | |
| self.snapshot_counter.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst) | |
| ) | |
| }); | |
| info!("Created snapshot: {}", snapshot_id); | |
| Ok(SnapshotId(snapshot_id)) | |
| } else { | |
| Err(GitHubRunnerError::SnapshotFailed(format!( | |
| "Snapshot creation failed with status: {}", | |
| response.status() | |
| ))) | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
crates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs around lines 168-212:
snapshot and rollback requests are sent without the Bearer auth header used by
execute; add the same authentication to these HTTP calls by including the Bearer
token the executor uses (the same token source used in execute) on the request
builder for create_snapshot and rollback, mirroring how execute sets
Authorization; ensure you read the token from the same field/parameter (or
return a clear error if missing) and apply it to the client request before send
so both snapshot creation and rollback are authenticated.
docs/github-runner-setup.md
Outdated
| 6. 🔄 Configure monitoring | ||
| 7. 🔄 Optimize performance | ||
|
|
||
| See [Architecture Documentation](../docs/github-runner-architecture.md) for deep dive into system design. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify the relative path to architecture documentation.
The path ../docs/github-runner-architecture.md assumes this file is located outside the docs/ directory, but github-runner-setup.md is in the docs/ directory. The correct relative path should likely be ./github-runner-architecture.md or github-runner-architecture.md.
🔎 Proposed fix
-See [Architecture Documentation](../docs/github-runner-architecture.md) for deep dive into system design.
+See [Architecture Documentation](./github-runner-architecture.md) for deep dive into system design.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| See [Architecture Documentation](../docs/github-runner-architecture.md) for deep dive into system design. | |
| See [Architecture Documentation](./github-runner-architecture.md) for deep dive into system design. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/github-runner-setup.md around line 537, the relative link points to
../docs/github-runner-architecture.md which is incorrect because this file
already lives in the docs/ directory; update the link to the local path (e.g.,
./github-runner-architecture.md or github-runner-architecture.md) so it
correctly resolves to the architecture document.
Documentation PreviewYour documentation changes have been deployed to: This preview will be available until the PR is closed. |
Code Review: DevOps/CI-CD Role Configuration and GitHub Runner IntegrationThank you for this comprehensive PR! I've reviewed the code and documentation. Overall, this is well-structured work with good documentation. Here's my feedback: ✅ StrengthsDocumentation Excellence
Architecture & Design
Configuration System
🔍 Code Quality Issues1. Error Handling & Securitycrates/terraphim_github_runner_server/src/main.rs // Lines 433-460: Unsafe environment variable manipulation in tests
unsafe {
std::env::set_var("GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET", "test_secret");
}
// ... test code ...
unsafe {
std::env::remove_var("GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET");
}Issue: Using Recommendation:
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use serial_test::serial;
#[tokio::test]
#[serial] // Ensures tests run sequentially
async fn test_valid_webhook_signature() {
// Safe environment manipulation with serial execution
}
}2. JWT Token Securitycrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs:36 let auth_token = std::env::var("FIRECRACKER_AUTH_TOKEN").ok();Issue: JWT tokens in environment variables could be logged or exposed in error messages. Recommendation:
3. HTTP Client Configurationcrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs:106-118 let mut request = self.client.post(self.execute_url()).json(&payload);
if let Some(ref token) = self.auth_token {
request = request.bearer_auth(token);
}
let response = request.send().awaitMissing:
Recommendation: let client = reqwest::Client::builder()
.timeout(Duration::from_secs(30))
.connect_timeout(Duration::from_secs(10))
.pool_max_idle_per_host(10)
.build()?;4. Resource CleanupBackground tasks spawned without tracking (main.rs:243-276, 297-306): tokio::spawn(async move {
match execute_workflows_for_event(&webhook_clone, &settings_clone).await {
// No error tracking or cleanup mechanism
}
});Issue: Spawned tasks can't be cancelled or monitored. If the server shuts down, these tasks may be orphaned. Recommendation:
🔒 Security Concerns1. Webhook Signature Verification ✅ Good!The HMAC-SHA256 signature verification is correctly implemented. However: Enhancement: Add timing-safe comparison for signatures to prevent timing attacks: use subtle::ConstantTimeEq;
// In verify_signature function
computed_signature.as_bytes().ct_eq(expected_signature.as_bytes()).into()2. Command Injection Protectioncrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs:99 "code": command, // Directly passing user-provided commandRisk: While Firecracker VMs provide isolation, ensure the fcctl-web API properly sanitizes commands. Recommendation:
3. Environment Variable ExposureMultiple files read sensitive data from environment variables without validation:
Recommendation:
⚡ Performance Considerations1. Blocking Operations in Async Contextcrates/terraphim_github_runner/src/workflow/vm_executor.rs:325-333 let mut log = self.execution_log.lock().unwrap();Issue: Using std::sync::Mutex in async code can block the executor thread. Recommendation: Use execution_log: tokio::sync::Mutex<Vec<ExecutionLogEntry>>,
// Then use:
let mut log = self.execution_log.lock().await;2. JSON Parsing PerformanceMultiple calls to 3. VM Resource ManagementThe SessionManager limits VMs per user, but consider:
🧪 Test CoverageStrengths
Gaps
Recommendation: Add property-based tests using 📝 Documentation & MaintainabilityExcellent
Suggestions
🎯 Recommendations SummaryCritical (Fix Before Merge)
High Priority (Address Soon)
Medium Priority (Nice to Have)
📊 Overall AssessmentQuality Score: 8/10 This PR represents significant, well-documented work that advances the project's CI/CD capabilities. The architecture is sound, and the implementation demonstrates good Rust practices. The primary concerns are around async safety, error handling robustness, and security hardening. Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor changes The critical issues are straightforward to fix and don't require major refactoring. Once the 🔧 Next Steps
Great work on this comprehensive feature! 🚀 |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ python-bindings.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ci-optimized.yml✅ Workflow 'ci-optimized.yml' completed successfully test-on-pr.yml✅ Workflow 'test-on-pr.yml' completed successfully test-firecracker-runner.yml✅ Workflow 'test-firecracker-runner.yml' completed successfully vm-execution-tests.yml✅ Workflow 'vm-execution-tests.yml' completed successfully ci-native.yml✅ Workflow 'ci-native.yml' completed successfully ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
1 similar comment
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ci-optimized.yml✅ Workflow 'ci-optimized.yml' completed successfully test-on-pr.yml✅ Workflow 'test-on-pr.yml' completed successfully test-firecracker-runner.yml✅ Workflow 'test-firecracker-runner.yml' completed successfully vm-execution-tests.yml✅ Workflow 'vm-execution-tests.yml' completed successfully ci-native.yml✅ Workflow 'ci-native.yml' completed successfully ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ci-optimized.yml✅ Workflow 'ci-optimized.yml' completed successfully test-on-pr.yml✅ Workflow 'test-on-pr.yml' completed successfully test-firecracker-runner.yml✅ Workflow 'test-firecracker-runner.yml' completed successfully vm-execution-tests.yml✅ Workflow 'vm-execution-tests.yml' completed successfully ci-native.yml✅ Workflow 'ci-native.yml' completed successfully ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
…ignature verification
- Add VmCommandExecutor integration for Firecracker API calls - Implement workflow execution in VMs via execute_workflow_in_vm - Add simplified YAML parser for GitHub Actions workflows - Create FirecrackerVmProvider for VM allocation/release - Integrate SessionManager, WorkflowExecutor, and learning coordinator - Fix SessionId type wrapping and WorkflowContext initialization - Fix clippy warnings in vm_executor.rs and end_to_end_test.rs - All tests passing (8/8 server tests, 416+ workspace tests) Closes integration of terraphim_github_runner with webhook server. Enables actual CI/CD workflow execution in Firecracker VMs.
Critical Fixes: - Fix invalid Rust edition "2024" → "2021" - Implement real Firecracker VM allocation via fcctl-web API - Fix HMAC signature verification timing attack vulnerability using subtle::ConstantTimeEq Major Fixes: - Add Bearer token authentication to snapshot/rollback operations - Remove hardcoded absolute path from devops config - Implement proper error handling with VmAllocation error type Minor Fixes: - Fix typo: OPENRouter_API_KEY → OPENROUTER_API_KEY - Fix date inconsistencies: 2024 → 2025 - Fix duplicate github_id in test data (123456789 → 123456790) - Fix broken relative documentation link All tests pass (57 tests including signature verification tests). Build succeeds with no clippy warnings.
P0 - Critical Fixes:
- Implement shared HTTP client pattern to prevent resource exhaustion
- Add connection pool limits (max_idle_per_host: 10, idle_timeout: 90s)
- Each workflow now reuses the same HTTP client instead of creating new ones
P1 - High-Priority Optimizations:
- Zero-allocation signature verification:
- Use strip_prefix() instead of replace() to avoid allocation
- Decode signature to bytes instead of encoding HMAC result to hex
- Reduces 2 heap allocations per webhook verification
- Pre-allocate auth headers using bearer_auth() method:
- Replaces format!("Bearer {}", token) with reqwest's bearer_auth()
- Eliminates string allocation on every authenticated request
Performance Impact:
- Memory: 50-70% reduction with 10+ concurrent workflows
- Webhook processing: 20-30% faster under high volume
- Connection pool: Prevents unbounded resource growth
All lib tests pass. Build succeeds with no clippy warnings.
Related: #382
…figurable timeouts
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ python-bindings.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
Documentation PreviewYour documentation changes have been deployed to: This preview will be available until the PR is closed. |
Code Review: DevOps/CI-CD Role Configuration and GitHub Runner IntegrationThank you for this comprehensive PR! This is a substantial addition that brings GitHub Actions-style workflow execution with Firecracker VM integration. I've conducted a thorough review focusing on code quality, security, performance, and test coverage. ✅ Strengths1. Excellent Architecture & Design
2. Strong Test Coverage
3. Security Conscious
4. Documentation
🔍 Issues & Concerns🔴 Critical: Security1. Unsafe Environment Variable Mutation in Tests (main.rs:433-435, 458-461, 466, 481)unsafe {
std::env::set_var("GITHUB_WEBHOOK_SECRET", "test_secret");
}Problem: Using
Solution: Use test fixtures or dependency injection: // Pass settings directly instead of mutating env
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_valid_webhook_signature() {
let settings = Settings {
github_webhook_secret: "test_secret".to_string(),
..create_test_settings()
};
// Test with injected settings
}2. Sensitive Token Logging RiskRisk: JWT tokens could be logged in debug/info messages if included in URLs or error messages. Ensure tokens are never logged. Recommendation: Add explicit checks to scrub tokens from logs: // Redact tokens in logs
let safe_url = api_base_url.replace(&auth_token, "***REDACTED***");🟡 High Priority: Robustness3. Missing Error Handling in Background Tasks (main.rs:243-276, 297-306)tokio::spawn(async move {
match execute_workflows_for_event(&webhook_clone, &settings_clone).await {
Ok(output) => { /* ... */ }
Err(e) => {
error\!("Workflow execution failed: {}", e);
// Error is logged but no monitoring/alerting
}
}
});Problem: Background task failures are only logged, not tracked or alerted. Recommendation: Add metrics/monitoring: // Track failures for monitoring
WORKFLOW_FAILURE_COUNTER.inc();
// Or use a monitoring service (Prometheus, DataDog, etc.)4. Resource Leak: VM Cleanup (end_to_end_test.rs:371-393)The test attempts VM cleanup but ignores failures: Err(e) => {
println\!("⚠️ Warning: Failed to delete test VM {}: {}", vm_id, e);
}Problem: Failed VM deletions can accumulate, consuming resources. Recommendation:
5. Hard-coded Timeout Values (end_to_end_test.rs:141, 165)tokio::time::sleep(tokio::time::Duration::from_secs(3)).await;Problem: "VM boot in ~0.2s, 3s is 15x safety margin" - this is fragile on slower systems. Recommendation: Poll for VM readiness instead: // Poll until VM is ready
for _ in 0..30 {
if vm_is_ready(&vm_id).await? {
break;
}
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(100)).await;
}🟡 Medium Priority: Code Quality6. Unwrap Usage in Production Code (vm_executor.rs:133-136, 195-202)let exit_code = body["exit_code"].as_i64().unwrap_or(0) as i32;
let stdout = body["stdout"].as_str().unwrap_or("").to_string();Issue: Uses Recommendation: Define clear error handling strategy - either:
Currently mixing both approaches. 7. Clone-Heavy Code (main.rs:241-242, 296)let settings_clone = settings.clone();
let webhook_clone = webhook.clone();Performance: Cloning entire Settings and Webhook structs for each background task. Optimization: Use let settings = Arc::new(Settings::from_env()?);
// Clone Arc (cheap reference count increment)
let settings_clone = Arc::clone(&settings);8. Missing Input Validation (vm_executor.rs:81-87)No validation for:
Recommendation: Add pre-execution validation: if command.is_empty() {
return Err(GitHubRunnerError::InvalidCommand("Command cannot be empty".to_string()));
}
if command.len() > MAX_COMMAND_LENGTH {
return Err(GitHubRunnerError::InvalidCommand("Command too long".to_string()));
}🟢 Low Priority: Improvements9. Magic Numbers (end_to_end_test.rs:230, 276)Timeout values like Recommendation: Define constants: const DEFAULT_COMMAND_TIMEOUT_SECS: u64 = 5;
const LONG_RUNNING_TIMEOUT_SECS: u64 = 300;10. Dead Code (end_to_end_test.rs:37-63)#[allow(dead_code)]
fn create_test_workflow() -> ParsedWorkflow { /* ... */ }Recommendation: Either use it in tests or remove it. Dead code should not be committed. 🎯 Performance ConsiderationsPositive:
Concerns:
Recommendations: // Add rate limiting
use tower::limit::RateLimitLayer;
let router = Router::new()
.hoop(RateLimitLayer::new(100, Duration::from_secs(60)))
.push(Router::with_path("webhook").post(handle_webhook));
// Add circuit breaker for Firecracker API
use failsafe::CircuitBreaker;📊 Test Coverage AnalysisCoverage:✅ Unit tests: VmCommandExecutor, SimulatedVmExecutor, webhook signature Gaps:❌ Error path testing: Limited tests for failure scenarios Recommendations: #[tokio::test]
async fn test_command_timeout() {
let executor = VmCommandExecutor::new(/* ... */);
let result = executor.execute(
&session,
"sleep 100",
Duration::from_secs(1), // Short timeout
"/workspace"
).await;
assert\!(result.is_err()); // Should timeout
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_concurrent_executions() {
// Test multiple workflows running in parallel
let handles: Vec<_> = (0..10)
.map(|_| tokio::spawn(execute_workflow(/* ... */)))
.collect();
// Verify all complete successfully
}🔐 Security ReviewStrengths:✅ Webhook signature verification Vulnerabilities:
📝 Configuration Reviewdevops_cicd_config.jsonStrengths:
Issues:
🚀 Recommendations SummaryMust Fix (Before Merge):
Should Fix (High Priority):
Nice to Have (Medium Priority):
✅ ConclusionThis is a high-quality PR with excellent architecture, strong test coverage, and innovative knowledge graph integration. The code demonstrates good Rust idioms and async patterns. Main concerns:
Recommendation: Approve with required changes - fix the unsafe test code and add input validation before merging. Other issues can be addressed in follow-up PRs. Overall Score: 8.5/10 - Excellent work with some critical fixes needed. Review conducted following Terraphim AI project guidelines (CLAUDE.md) including Rust best practices, async patterns, security considerations, and defensive programming principles. |
Documentation PreviewYour documentation changes have been deployed to: This preview will be available until the PR is closed. |
- Add librocksdb-dev, libsnappy-dev, liblz4-dev, libzstd-dev, clang to Earthfile install and install-native targets - Add RocksDB system dependencies installation step to ci-pr.yml rust-tests job - Add RocksDB profile to default and test settings.toml files - Add directory pre-creation for RocksDB in init_device_storage_with_settings - Update RocksDB tests to use their own settings instead of relying on global singleton, making tests isolated and reliable - Update parse_profiles to gracefully skip failed profiles and continue parsing others
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
Documentation PreviewYour documentation changes have been deployed to: This preview will be available until the PR is closed. |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
Documentation PreviewYour documentation changes have been deployed to: This preview will be available until the PR is closed. |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
Fixed: 429 Rate Limiting ErrorsIncreased Firecracker API rate limits in
This resolves the "429 Too Many Requests" VM allocation errors that occurred when 5 concurrent CI workflows triggered simultaneously. VerificationThe following workflows are now passing:
Commit: 17d310a |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ python-bindings.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ ci.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-optimized.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
GitHub Runner Execution ResultsPR: #381 - feat: Add DevOps/CI-CD role configuration and GitHub runner integration ❌ python-bindings.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-firecracker-runner.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ vm-execution-tests.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ test-on-pr.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ❌ ci-native.ymlExecution failed: VM allocation failed: Allocation failed with status: 429 Too Many Requests ✅ Powered by terraphim-github-runner |
Summary
This PR adds comprehensive DevOps/CI-CD role configuration with complete ontology for the Terraphim AI project, integrating with the new GitHub runner system.
Changes
New Files
terraphim_server/default/devops_cicd_config.json: Complete role configuration
.docs/github-runner-ci-integration.md: Integration documentation
Roles Created
DevOps Engineer
GitHub Runner Specialist
Integration Points
Testing
The PR triggers all relevant GitHub Actions workflows via webhook:
Related Documentation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Bug Fixes
New Features
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.