Skip to content

Remove artemis#391

Merged
evgeni merged 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
jturel:remove_artemis
May 7, 2026
Merged

Remove artemis#391
evgeni merged 1 commit intotheforeman:masterfrom
jturel:remove_artemis

Conversation

@jturel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jturel jturel commented Feb 27, 2026

Katello no longer consumes events from Candlepin, and does not connect to the embedded Artemis broker. This is part of an effort to clean the remaining pieces which are:

The test failure seems expected - hammer ping will pass once new hammer and katello RPMs reach nightly repos. I was able to spin up a dev environment and see that Candlepin was healthy.

@jturel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jturel commented Apr 9, 2026

The night has passed and the (nightly) tests are still using outdated hammer-cli-katello. Can someone give me a TLDR of what needs to happen (and where) for recently merged changes there to be incorporated as part of the test runs here?

@ehelms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ehelms commented Apr 10, 2026

The repo is locked right now to 3.18 images. I have proposed swapping to nightly: #424

@ehelms
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ehelms commented May 5, 2026

Now that #424 is merged, I can update our nightly images. However, I want to hold off doing that until the current infra issues with the vagrant repository are resolved.

@ehelms ehelms force-pushed the remove_artemis branch from 092184c to bf1f8d0 Compare May 7, 2026 12:27
@jturel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

jturel commented May 7, 2026

It's green and I didn't have to fix anything. I like that!

@evgeni evgeni merged commit 2484ef9 into theforeman:master May 7, 2026
12 checks passed
@evgeni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

evgeni commented May 7, 2026

next: remove the rest of candlepin :D

@jturel jturel deleted the remove_artemis branch May 7, 2026 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants