Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.springframework:spring-web from 3.2.6.RELEASE to 6.2.17#16

Open
philvarner-snyk wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-5108d75601c8e4d524daa44f944f66ff
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade org.springframework:spring-web from 3.2.6.RELEASE to 6.2.17#16
philvarner-snyk wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-5108d75601c8e4d524daa44f944f66ff

Conversation

@philvarner-snyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • todolist-goof/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
low severity Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
SNYK-JAVA-ORGSPRINGFRAMEWORK-15701755
  40   org.springframework:spring-web:
3.2.6.RELEASE -> 6.2.17
Major version upgrade No Path Found No Known Exploit

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: High

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@philvarner-snyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Merge Risk: High

This is a major version upgrade from Spring Framework 3.2 to 6.2, which is a massive leap spanning three major versions (v4, v5, v6) and over a decade of evolution. This upgrade introduces substantial breaking changes that will require significant code and configuration refactoring.

Key Breaking Changes:

  • Java Version Requirement: Spring Framework 6.0 requires Java 17 as a minimum baseline. This is a significant jump from Spring 3.2, which was compatible with Java 6.
  • Jakarta EE Namespace Migration: Spring 6 has migrated from Java EE to Jakarta EE. This means all javax.* package imports (like javax.servlet and javax.persistence) must be changed to jakarta.*. This is a codebase-wide change that is mandatory.
  • Removal of Deprecated Classes: Many classes and methods deprecated in versions 4 and 5 have been removed in Spring 6. This includes several RPC-style remoting features and the org.springframework.orm.hibernate3 package.
  • Spring MVC Changes:
    • Trailing slash matching is now disabled by default. A request to GET /endpoint/ will no longer match a @GetMapping("/endpoint").
    • HttpMethod is now a class, not an enum, which may affect switch statements.
    • RestTemplate and its HttpComponentsClientHttpRequestFactory now require Apache HttpClient 5.
  • Core Messaging Abstractions Moved: In the upgrade to v4, core messaging abstractions like Message and MessageChannel were moved to the spring-messaging module, requiring import changes.
  • Environment and Dependency Upgrades: The upgrade requires newer versions of dependent libraries, such as Tomcat 10+, Jetty 11+, and Hibernate 6.1+.

Recommendation: This is a very high-effort migration that should be treated as a major project, not a simple dependency bump. A phased approach is recommended:

  1. First, migrate the application from Spring 3.2 to the latest Spring 4.3 release.
  2. Then, migrate from 4.3 to the latest Spring 5.3 release, which requires a Java 8 baseline.
  3. Finally, undertake the migration from 5.3 to 6.x, which includes the Java 17 and Jakarta EE changes.

Automated refactoring tools like OpenRewrite can assist with some of the mechanical changes like package renaming.

Sources:

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@philvarner-snyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

philvarner-snyk commented Mar 21, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants