Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Clear pixel values are not filtering correctly from QA_PIXEL and we're getting 100% cloud cover every datapoint. This is the second time we've had something go wrong with filtering QA_PIXEL based on 'clear' values. So I'm switching to directly bit filtering. Cloud bits are: Bit 1: Dilated Cloud, Bit 3: Cloud, Bit 4: Cloud Shadow. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are 4 large negative NDVI values that must be from bad pixels in the data. Negative values should only represent water or cloud cover. 2 of these have only a handful of pixels, so they are probably cloud cover.
Closes #614