feat(defense): add Revisiting (BaseDefense)#19
Open
razon1494 wants to merge 1 commit intoyushundong:mainfrom
Open
feat(defense): add Revisiting (BaseDefense)#19razon1494 wants to merge 1 commit intoyushundong:mainfrom
razon1494 wants to merge 1 commit intoyushundong:mainfrom
Conversation
Sparshkhare1306
pushed a commit
to Sparshkhare1306/PyGIP-backup
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2025
Add RQ3_tradeoff.sh for defense trade-off analysis
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📋 Summary
feat(defense): add
Revisitingdefense (BaseDefense) + runnable exampleRevisitingatmodels/defense/Revisiting.py.models/defense/BaseDefense.defend()supported_api_types = {"dgl"}models/defense/__init__.py.examples/revisiting_cora.pyto demonstrate usage.models/attack/*(scope kept defense-only per review feedback).Method (high-level):
Localized neighbor-mixing on a subset of nodes (≈
attack_node_fraction * |V|):u:x[u] ← (1 − α)·x[u] + α·mean(x[N(u)])v: lighter mix0.5·α.defend()trains GraphSAGE on original features (baseline) and on transformed features (defended) and returns both test accuracies plus metadata.How to run
python -m examples.revisiting_cora # or python examples/revisiting_cora.pyReturn value from
.defend(){ "ok": True, "method": "Revisiting", "alpha": <float>, "focus_nodes": <int>, "baseline_test_acc": <float>, "defense_test_acc": <float>, "acc_delta": <float>, "sample_picked_nodes": <list[int]>, }🧪 Related Issues
models/defense/, and should use a.defend()API by inheritingBaseDefense.Closes #<id>,Fixes #<id>, etc.✅ Checklist
feat/revisiting-defense), notmain🧠 Additional Context (Optional)
Files added/updated
models/defense/Revisiting.py— new defense (inheritsBaseDefense)models/defense/__init__.py— exportRevisitingexamples/revisiting_cora.py— runnable exampleExample output on Cora (
alpha = 0.8,attack_node_fraction = 0.2)Small utility drop is expected with feature mixing; tuning
alpha(e.g., 0.4–0.6) can adjust the trade-off.Design notes
RandomWMpattern (DGL + NeighborSampler/NodeCollator + GraphSAGE).try/finallyto restore original features.