Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions Programs/Test/BinaryToDecimal.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
#Author: OMKAR PATHAK
#This program converts the given binary number to its decimal equivalent

def binaryToDecimal(binary):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 95% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Incorrect Function Naming Convention

In Python, function names should follow the snake_case convention. The current name binaryToDecimal uses camelCase, which is inconsistent with PEP 8 standards.

Suggested change
def binaryToDecimal(binary):
def binary_to_decimal(binary):
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python's PEP 8 style guide explicitly recommends snake_case for function and variable names
  2. Consistent naming conventions improve code maintainability and developer onboarding
  3. camelCase is non-standard in the Python ecosystem and can lead to stylistic inconsistencies

Gaps

  1. Some legacy codebases or specific project guidelines might intentionally use camelCase for consistency with other languages
  2. The function name is otherwise descriptive and clear in its purpose

'''This function calculates the decimal equivalent to given binary number'''
binary1 = binary
decimal, i, n = 0, 0, 0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 88% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Single-Character Variable Names

The variable names 'i' and 'n' are non-descriptive. While 'i' is often used as a loop counter, 'n' appears unused in the provided logic. Use descriptive names like 'power_index'.

Suggested change
decimal, i, n = 0, 0, 0
decimal, power_index = 0, 0
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Single-letter variables like 'n' provide no context regarding the data they represent
  2. Using 'power_index' instead of 'i' clarifies the mathematical role of the variable in the conversion
  3. Removing unused variables like 'n' reduces cognitive load and improves code cleanliness

Gaps

  1. 'i' is a widely accepted convention for indices even outside of explicit for-loop definitions
  2. The variable 'n' might be intended for future logic not visible in this specific diff

while(binary != 0):
dec = binary % 10
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 82% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Non-Standard Abbreviation

The variable name 'dec' is a non-standard abbreviation. Expanding it to 'remainder' or 'last_digit' would make the mathematical operation more explicit and readable.

Suggested change
dec = binary % 10
last_digit = binary % 10
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. 'dec' is ambiguous and could be confused with 'decimal' or 'decrement'
  2. 'last_digit' accurately describes the result of the modulo 10 operation in this context
  3. Fully expressive names prevent misunderstandings during future code maintenance

Gaps

  1. 'dec' is a common clipping of 'decimal', though here it represents a single digit
  2. In short mathematical functions, such abbreviations are sometimes tolerated for brevity

decimal = decimal + dec * pow(2, i)
binary = binary//10
i += 1
Comment on lines +8 to +12
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 95%

Missing Binary Input Validation

Currently, the code accepts any integer (like 123) and treats it as binary, which leads to mathematically incorrect decimal conversions. We should ensure the input only contains digits 0 and 1 to maintain functional correctness.

Suggested change
while(binary != 0):
dec = binary % 10
decimal = decimal + dec * pow(2, i)
binary = binary//10
i += 1
while(binary != 0):
dec = binary % 10
if dec not in (0, 1):
print('Invalid binary digit detected')
return
decimal = decimal + dec * pow(2, i)
binary = binary // 10
i += 1
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Non-binary digits (2-9) are processed without error, yielding wrong results
  2. Functional correctness depends on the input being a base-2 representation
  3. Lack of validation allows logical errors in the mathematical conversion

Gaps

  1. The current implementation assumes the user provides valid binary integers
  2. Adding validation changes the control flow of the existing function

print('Decimal equivalent of {} is {}'.format(binary1, decimal))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 100%

Incorrect Output Message

I noticed that the print statement uses the variable binary, which has been reduced to 0 by the end of the while loop. This results in an output like 'Decimal equivalent of 0 is 10' instead of the original input. We should use binary1, which stores the original value, to make the message accurate.

Suggested change
print('Decimal equivalent of {} is {}'.format(binary1, decimal))
print('Decimal equivalent of {} is {}'.format(binary1, decimal))


if __name__ == '__main__':
userInput = int(input('Enter the binary number to check its decimal equivalent: '))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 95% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Incorrect Variable Naming Convention

The variable userInput uses camelCase. In Python, local variables should follow the snake_case convention (e.g., user_input) to align with PEP 8 standards.

Suggested change
userInput = int(input('Enter the binary number to check its decimal equivalent: '))
user_input = int(input('Enter the binary number to check its decimal equivalent: '))
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. PEP 8 specifies that variable names should be lowercase, with words separated by underscores
  2. Consistency in casing prevents the codebase from looking like a mix of different languages
  3. Standardized naming facilitates better integration with static analysis tools and linters

Gaps

  1. The variable name is descriptive, with the only issue being the casing style
  2. Project-specific conventions might occasionally override PEP 8, though rare in Python

binaryToDecimal(userInput)
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions Programs/Test/CharCount.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
#Author: OMKAR PATHAK
#This program checks for the character frequency in the given string

def charFrequency(userInput):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 90% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Boolean-Returning Function Without Prefix

The function charFrequency returns a dictionary, but its name uses camelCase which violates Python's snake_case convention. Additionally, if it were a boolean check, it would require a prefix.

Suggested change
def charFrequency(userInput):
def get_char_frequency(user_input):
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python functions should follow the snake_case naming convention per PEP 8
  2. Adding a verb like 'get' or 'calculate' clarifies the action being performed
  3. Improves consistency with standard Python library naming patterns

Gaps

  1. The standard CS-2 focuses on boolean prefixes and vague verbs; while 'charFrequency' is a noun-phrase, it lacks a verb
  2. Python naming conventions (PEP 8) are the primary driver for the suggested change to snake_case

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 95% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Variable Naming Violation (camelCase)

The parameter userInput uses camelCase, which is not the standard convention for Python. Use snake_case (e.g., user_input) to align with PEP 8 guidelines.

Suggested change
def charFrequency(userInput):
def charFrequency(user_input):
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python's PEP 8 style guide mandates snake_case for function arguments
  2. Consistent naming conventions reduce cognitive load for Python developers
  3. Mixed naming styles (camelCase vs snake_case) create a messy codebase

Gaps

  1. camelCase is technically functional but violates language-specific style guides
  2. The impact on code execution is zero, but it affects maintainability and consistency

'''This fuction helps to count the char frequency in the given string '''
userInput = userInput.lower() #covert to lowercase
dict = {}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Critical Confidence Score: 100% View Citation

Forbidden Generic Name / Built-in Shadowing

The variable name dict shadows the built-in Python dict type. This can lead to subtle bugs and is considered a forbidden generic name.

Suggested change
dict = {}
char_counts = {}

for char in userInput:
keys = dict.keys()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 80% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Vague but Functional Generic Name

The variable name keys is generic. While functional, a more descriptive name like existing_chars or dictionary_keys would improve semantic clarity.

Suggested change
keys = dict.keys()
existing_chars = dict.keys()
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Generic names like 'keys' provide minimal information about the data content
  2. Improving semantic clarity helps developers understand the loop logic faster
  3. Aligns with the goal of making variable names fully expressive

Gaps

  1. 'keys' is contextually relevant to a dictionary but remains a generic term
  2. The logic itself is being flagged as inefficient in other reviews, affecting naming relevance

if char in keys:
Comment on lines +9 to +10
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 100%

JAS - Just a suggestion
Inefficient Dictionary Lookup

I notice we're calling dict.keys() inside the loop and then checking if the character exists in those keys. In Python, you can check for membership directly in the dictionary, which is much more efficient and readable. This avoids creating a new view object on every iteration of the loop.

Suggested change
keys = dict.keys()
if char in keys:
if char in dict:

dict[char] += 1
else:
dict[char] = 1
return dict

if __name__ == '__main__':
userInput = str(input('Enter a string: '))
print(charFrequency(userInput))
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions Programs/Test/Factorial.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
#Author: OMKAR PATHAK
#This program calculates the factorial of a given number

def factorial(number):
'''This function calculates the factorial of a number'''
if number == 1 or number == 0:
return 1
Comment on lines +6 to +7
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Critical Confidence Score: 100%

Potential Recursion Depth Error

The recursive factorial function doesn't handle negative numbers, which will lead to a RecursionError (maximum recursion depth exceeded) because the base case number == 1 or number == 0 will never be met. It's a good practice to add a check for negative inputs to prevent the application from crashing.

Suggested change
if number == 1 or number == 0:
return 1
if number < 0:
return "Factorial is not defined for negative numbers"
if number == 1 or number == 0:
return 1

else:
return number * factorial(number - 1)

def factorial_without_recursion(number):
fact = 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 85% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Refine Variable Name for Clarity

The variable name 'fact' is a common abbreviation. Expanding it to 'factorial_result' or 'result' improves semantic clarity and aligns with descriptive naming standards.

Suggested change
fact = 1
factorial_result = 1
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Expanding abbreviations reduces cognitive load for developers reading the code
  2. 'factorial_result' explicitly describes the data being accumulated in the loop
  3. Avoids non-standard short forms in favor of fully expressive alternatives

Gaps

  1. 'fact' is a widely recognized abbreviation in mathematical programming contexts
  2. The local scope of the function makes the variable's purpose relatively clear

while(number > 0):
fact = fact * number
number = number - 1
print('Factorial of', number,'is: ')
print(fact)
Comment on lines +13 to +17
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 100%

Logical Error in Iterative Factorial Output

I noticed a small logic issue in the factorial_without_recursion function. Since the number variable is decremented within the while loop, the final print statement will always display 'Factorial of 0 is:' regardless of the original input. We should use a temporary variable or print the result before the loop finishes to keep the output accurate.

Suggested change
while(number > 0):
fact = fact * number
number = number - 1
print('Factorial of', number,'is: ')
print(fact)
print('Factorial of', number,'is: ')
while(number > 0):
fact = fact * number
number = number - 1
print(fact)


if __name__ == '__main__':
userInput = int(input('Enter the number to find its factorial: '))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 100%

Missing Input Validation for Non-Integers

We're currently casting userInput directly to an int. If a user enters a string or a float, the program will crash with a ValueError. Adding a simple try-except block would make the script much more robust and user-friendly.

Suggested change
userInput = int(input('Enter the number to find its factorial: '))
try:
userInput = int(input('Enter the number to find its factorial: '))
except ValueError:
print("Invalid input. Please enter an integer.")
exit()

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 92% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Inconsistent Naming Convention

The variable 'userInput' uses camelCase, which is inconsistent with the snake_case convention used elsewhere in the file and standard Python practices.

Suggested change
userInput = int(input('Enter the number to find its factorial: '))
user_input = int(input('Enter the number to find its factorial: '))
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python standard (PEP 8) recommends snake_case for variable and function names
  2. Consistency in naming styles across a module improves overall maintainability
  3. Refactoring mixed styles ensures the codebase follows a unified professional standard

Gaps

  1. Naming style choice can sometimes be influenced by personal or legacy preferences
  2. The variable is functional and its purpose is clear despite the casing style

print('Factorial of', userInput, 'is:', factorial(userInput))
factorial_without_recursion(userInput)
24 changes: 24 additions & 0 deletions Programs/Test/Fibonacci.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
#Author: OMKAR PATHAK
#This program calculates the fibonacci series till the n-th term

def fibonacci(number):
'''This function calculates the fibonacci series till the n-th term'''
if number <= 1:
return number
else:
return (fibonacci(number - 1) + fibonacci(number - 2))

def fibonacci_without_recursion(number):
if number == 0: return 0
fibonacci0, fibonacci1 = 0, 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 82% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Refine Variable Names for Clarity

The variable names fibonacci0 and fibonacci1 are functional but could be more expressive. Using names like previous_term and current_term better describes their roles in the Fibonacci sequence calculation.

Suggested change
fibonacci0, fibonacci1 = 0, 1
previous_term, current_term = 0, 1
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Descriptive names like 'previous_term' clarify the state of the algorithm at each step
  2. Avoids using numeric suffixes which can be less intuitive than descriptive adjectives
  3. Enhances maintainability by making the logic self-documenting for future readers

Gaps

  1. The current names are mathematically accurate in the context of sequence indices
  2. Refinement is subjective and depends on the developer's preference for mathematical vs. descriptive naming

for i in range(2, number + 1):
fibonacci1, fibonacci0 = fibonacci0 + fibonacci1, fibonacci1
return fibonacci1
Comment on lines +14 to +16
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 85%

JAS - Just a suggestion
Logic Error: Incorrect Iterative Fibonacci Logic

In the fibonacci_without_recursion function, the tuple unpacking logic fibonacci1, fibonacci0 = fibonacci0 + fibonacci1, fibonacci1 is correct for updating the sequence, but the loop range and initial conditions might return the wrong value for n=1. If number is 1, the loop range(2, 2) won't execute, and it returns fibonacci1 which is 1 (correct), but the logic is slightly fragile for edge cases.

Suggested change
for i in range(2, number + 1):
fibonacci1, fibonacci0 = fibonacci0 + fibonacci1, fibonacci1
return fibonacci1
for i in range(1, number):
fibonacci0, fibonacci1 = fibonacci1, fibonacci0 + fibonacci1
return fibonacci1
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Standard iterative Fibonacci uses a more readable state update pattern
  2. Current loop range starts at 2, which skips execution for small inputs
  3. Improving the loop structure makes the mathematical intent clearer

Gaps

  1. The original logic actually works for n=1 and n=0 but is less idiomatic
  2. Tuple unpacking order in the original code is slightly unconventional


if __name__ == '__main__':
userInput = int(input('Enter the number upto which you wish to calculate fibonnaci series: '))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 95% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Variable Naming Convention (camelCase in Python)

The variable userInput uses camelCase, which is not the standard naming convention for Python variables. Following PEP 8, variable names should use snake_case for better consistency with the Python ecosystem.

Suggested change
userInput = int(input('Enter the number upto which you wish to calculate fibonnaci series: '))
user_input = int(input('Enter the number upto which you wish to calculate fibonnaci series: '))
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python's PEP 8 style guide mandates snake_case for variable and function names
  2. Consistent naming conventions reduce cognitive load when switching between Python projects
  3. Using snake_case aligns the code with standard Python library and community practices

Gaps

  1. Project-specific style guides might occasionally permit camelCase for consistency with other languages
  2. The variable name is descriptive, so the violation is purely stylistic rather than functional

for i in range(userInput + 1):
print(fibonacci(i),end=' ')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 100%

Performance Issue: Exponential Time Complexity in Recursion

The current recursive implementation of fibonacci has a time complexity of O(2^n). For larger values of userInput, this will cause the program to hang or crash due to redundant calculations. We should use the iterative version or memoization to ensure the program remains responsive.

Suggested change
print(fibonacci(i),end=' ')
print(fibonacci_without_recursion(i),end=' ')


print("\nUsing LOOP:")
print(fibonacci_without_recursion(userInput))
19 changes: 19 additions & 0 deletions Programs/Test/LCM.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
#Author: OMKAR PATHAK
#This program calculates the LCM of the two numbers entered by the user

def LCM(number1, number2):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 85% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Non-Standard Function Naming

In Python, function names should follow the snake_case convention. Additionally, while 'LCM' is a common abbreviation, using a more descriptive name like calculate_lcm improves readability.

Suggested change
def LCM(number1, number2):
def calculate_lcm(number1, number2):
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python naming conventions (PEP 8) require function names to be in lowercase snake_case
  2. All-caps names are typically reserved for constants, leading to potential confusion
  3. Descriptive verbs like 'calculate' clarify the function's intent as an action

Gaps

  1. 'LCM' is a widely recognized mathematical abbreviation which might be acceptable in scientific contexts
  2. The project may not strictly enforce PEP 8 snake_case for mathematical utility functions

'''This function calculates LCM of two numbers inputed by the user'''
maximum = max(number1, number2)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 95%

Infinite Loop Risk with Non-Positive Inputs

I notice that if a user enters 0 or a negative number, the current logic will result in an infinite loop because the increment i += maximum will not progress towards a common multiple correctly. We should add a check to ensure both numbers are positive integers before proceeding with the calculation to prevent the application from hanging.

Suggested change
maximum = max(number1, number2)
if number1 <= 0 or number2 <= 0:
return 0
maximum = max(number1, number2)
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Input of zero causes 'maximum' to be zero or the other number, leading to infinite loop
  2. Negative inputs are not handled, which is mathematically valid but logically broken here
  3. Prevents runtime hangs and ensures the function behaves predictably for all integers

Gaps

  1. The intended use case might only be for positive integers based on the author's comment
  2. Python's math.lcm handles zero differently by returning zero

i = maximum
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 80% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Single-Character Variable Name

The variable name 'i' is used here as a tracking value for the multiple being checked. While common in loops, a more descriptive name like 'current_multiple' would enhance clarity.

Suggested change
i = maximum
current_multiple = maximum
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Single-letter variables (except for simple loop counters) increase cognitive load
  2. 'current_multiple' explicitly describes the data the variable represents
  3. Improves maintainability by making the algorithm's logic self-documenting

Gaps

  1. 'i' is a standard convention for counters, though usually within 'for' loop definitions
  2. The local scope is very small, making the purpose of 'i' relatively easy to trace

while True:
if (i % number1 == 0 and i % number2 == 0):
lcm = i
break
i += maximum

return lcm

if __name__ == '__main__':
userInput1 = int(input('Enter first number: '))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 90% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Refine Variable Naming and Case

The variable userInput1 uses camelCase, which is non-standard for Python variables. It should be converted to snake_case (e.g., user_input_1) to align with language conventions.

Suggested change
userInput1 = int(input('Enter first number: '))
user_input_1 = int(input('Enter first number: '))
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Python standard (PEP 8) specifies snake_case for all variable and function names
  2. Consistent casing across the codebase prevents stylistic friction for maintainers
  3. Removing numeric suffixes in favor of descriptive parts improves semantic clarity

Gaps

  1. The name is functional and understandable, making this a low-priority refinement
  2. Some developers coming from Java/JS backgrounds may use camelCase intentionally

userInput2 = int(input('Enter second number: '))
print('LCM of {} and {} is {}'.format( userInput1, userInput2, LCM(userInput1, userInput2)))
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions Programs/Test/PrimeNumber.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
#Author: OMKAR PATHAK
#This program checks whether the entered number is prime or not

def checkPrime(number):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 90% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Boolean-Returning Function Without Prefix

The function returns a boolean value but lacks a standard boolean prefix like 'is_' or 'has_'. Renaming it to 'is_prime' follows Python naming conventions for boolean functions.

Suggested change
def checkPrime(number):
def is_prime(number):
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Functions returning booleans should use prefixes like 'is_' for clarity
  2. Improves readability by making the function's return type predictable from its name
  3. Follows standard Python naming conventions for predicate functions

Gaps

  1. The current name 'checkPrime' is common in competitive programming contexts
  2. The function prints output in addition to returning/setting a boolean, which slightly blurs its primary role

'''This function checks for prime number'''
isPrime = False
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 95% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Non-Standard Case Convention

In Python, variable names should follow the snake_case convention. 'isPrime' should be renamed to 'is_prime' to align with PEP 8 standards.

Suggested change
isPrime = False
is_prime = False
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. PEP 8 explicitly recommends snake_case for variable and function names
  2. Consistent casing reduces cognitive load when reading Python codebases
  3. Avoids mixing naming styles within the same project or module

Gaps

  1. camelCase is functional and common for developers coming from Java/C++ backgrounds
  2. The variable's purpose is clear despite the non-standard casing

if number == 2:
print(number, 'is a Prime Number')
Comment on lines +7 to +8
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 100%

Redundant Logic for Number 2

I noticed that we're checking if number == 2 twice. First in an explicit if block and then implicitly within the if number > 1 block. Since 2 is the only even prime, we can simplify this by handling the range check more effectively to avoid redundant print statements.

Suggested change
if number == 2:
print(number, 'is a Prime Number')
if number > 1:

if number > 1:
for i in range(2, number):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Warning Confidence Score: 100%

Performance Issue: Inefficient Prime Check

Currently, the loop runs up to number - 1. For large numbers, this is quite slow. We only need to check up to the square root of the number to determine if it's prime, which significantly improves performance for larger inputs.

Suggested change
for i in range(2, number):
for i in range(2, int(number**0.5) + 1):

if number % i == 0:
print(number, 'is not a Prime Number')
isPrime = False
break
else:
isPrime = True

if isPrime:
print(number, 'is a Prime Number')

if __name__ == '__main__':
userInput = int(input('Enter a number to check: '))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JAS Confidence Score: 95% View Citation

JAS - Just a suggestion
Non-Standard Case Convention

Variable names in Python should use snake_case rather than camelCase. Renaming 'userInput' to 'user_input' ensures consistency with Python style guides.

Suggested change
userInput = int(input('Enter a number to check: '))
user_input = int(input('Enter a number to check: '))
Reasons & Gaps

Reasons

  1. Adheres to the PEP 8 standard for variable naming in Python
  2. Maintains stylistic consistency across the Python ecosystem
  3. Prevents the 'mixedCase' anti-pattern in Python scripts

Gaps

  1. The variable name is descriptive and its meaning is unambiguous
  2. Project-specific conventions might occasionally allow camelCase for local variables

checkPrime(userInput)
File renamed without changes.
Loading